|
Lincoln University >
Research Archive >
Theses and Dissertations >
Theses and Dissertations with Restricted Access >
Cite or link to this item using this URL:
http://hdl.handle.net/10182/2133
|
| Title: | The legal system as a mechanism for making environmental policy comprehensive and ecologically rational |
| Author: | Came, S. G. |
| Degree: | Master of Science |
| Institution: | Lincoln University |
| Date: | 1991 |
| Item Type: | Thesis |
| Abstract: | This study considers the strengths and weaknesses of the legal system as a mechanism for making environmental policy more comprehensive and ecologically rational. The approach taken is to examine the way in which ideologies about the law influence its usefulness as a policy tool. It was found that the traditional view of the law acts as a barrier to legal involvement in policy making because it adopts a narrow view of justiciability. The private property ideology acts as a barrier because its primary focus is private property interests. The public interest ideology acts as a barrier because of its simultaneous focus on the conflicting interests of resource exploitation and resource conservation. The public participation ideology was found to be the most useful ideology. The Resource Management Act is analysed as an attempt by Parliament to direct the courts to give greater recognition to the public participation ideology. I conclude that this law reform is likely to prove beneficial in terms of using the legal system to make environmental policy more comprehensive and ecologically rational. |
| Supervisor: | Steven, Jenny |
| Persistent URL (URI): | http://hdl.handle.net/10182/2133 |
| Rights: | http://purl.org/net/lulib/thesisrights |
| Access Rights: | Digital thesis can be viewed by current staff and students of Lincoln University only. Print copy available for reading in Lincoln University Library. May be available through inter-library loan. |
| Appears in Collections: | Theses and Dissertations with Restricted Access Department of Environmental Management
|
Copyright in individual works within the Research Archive belongs to their authors and/or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. Unless otherwise indicated, all other rights are reserved, except for other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country. If you believe that copyright is being infringed by material available in this archive, contact us and we will investigate.
|