|
Lincoln University >
Research Archive >
Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences >
Department of Agricultural Sciences >
Cite or link to this item using this URL:
http://hdl.handle.net/10182/3616
|
| Title: | Calibration of dynamic responses in a physiological model |
| Author: | Bell, S. T. McKinnon, Alan E. Sykes, Andrew R. |
| Date: | Dec-2007 |
| Publisher: | Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc. |
| Item Type: | Conference Contribution - Full Conference Paper |
| Abstract: | Dynamic physiological models are often
constructed to gain insight into the operation of a
complex biological function. In applications such
as the study of disease risk, different individuals
may vary in susceptibility to disease or response
to treatment. An example of this type of
application is the dairy cow magnesium model
(Bell et al. 2008) used to asses the proportion of
animals in a herd at risk of developing
hypomagnesaemic tetany. The onset of tetany
occurs when the concentration of Mg in
cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) falls below a critical
level of ~0.54 mmol.l-1 (Allsop & Pauli, 1985).
The CSF magnesium concentration is determined
by the exchange of Mg between plasma and CSF
(Robson et al. 2004). Bell (2006) used the
experiment of McCoy et al. (2001) to demonstrate
simulation of dynamic changes of plasma and
cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) magnesium
concentration in dairy cattle that occur in response
to feeding a magnesium deficient diet over a
period of 15 days.
Biological variation between animals was
modelled by implementing selected parameters of
the dynamic model as distributions, and then a
Monte-Carlo method was used to generate a
distribution of a selected model response variable
(response distribution). A problem with this
approach is that the accuracy of the response
distribution depends on the accuracy of the
parameter distributions used in the model
simulations. The refinement algorithm described
by Bell et al. (2006) provides a method to obtain
parameter distributions that minimise the error
between a simulated response distribution and a
corresponding experimentally observed response
distribution (such as Mg excreted in urine). The
adjustments to parameter distributions are
constrained within their feasible biological range
(a priori range), and are made by combining
information for each parameter about both the
sensitivity of the response to change in the
parameter, and the constraint to the a priori range.The refinement procedure is currently limited to
using a single response distribution when
calculating updated parameter distributions.
An important issue is the calibration of model
parameters specific to the dairy herd in which the
risk of tetany is estimated. In the model Mg
intake is determined by feed intake and pasture
characteristics, which may change from day to
day due to changes in feed management practice
on the farm. Measuring feed and Mg intake
directly is not practical for a commercial dairy
herd. A possible method of calibrating the model
to a specific herd is to take measurements of Mg
in samples of urine on successive days, then
estimate parameters for feed and Mg intake that
minimise the error between the simulated and
measured urinary Mg excretion.
This paper describes an extension of the
refinement procedure to include time-series
dynamic response data into the selection of
updated parameter distributions, which allows
improved calibration of dynamic responses in the
model. |
| Description: | Conference paper presented at the MODSIM07, International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, held December 2007, University of Canterbury, New Zealand. |
| Persistent URL (URI): | http://hdl.handle.net/10182/3616 |
| Related: | Original publication available from: http://www.mssanz.org.au |
| Related URI: | http://www.mssanz.org.au/ |
| ISBN: | 978-0-9758400-4-7 |
| Rights: | Copyright © The Authors. The responsibility for the contents of this paper rests upon the authors and not on the Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc. |
| Appears in Collections: | Department of Agricultural Sciences
|
Copyright in individual works within the Research Archive belongs to their authors and/or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. Unless otherwise indicated, all other rights are reserved, except for other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country. If you believe that copyright is being infringed by material available in this archive, contact us and we will investigate.
|