Lincoln University Research Archive LAND where you want to be

Lincoln University > Research Archive > Research Centres and Units > Bio-Protection Research Centre > Bio-Protection Research Centre >

Cite or link to this item using this URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10182/3668

Title: Towards a global barcode library for Lymantria (Lepidoptera: Lymantriinae) tussock moths of biosecurity concern
Author: Boykin, Laura M.
Armstrong, Karen F.
deWaard, Jeremy R.
Mitchell, Andrew
Keena, Melody A.
Gopurenko, David
Pogue, Michael G.
Lima, Joao
Floyd, Robin
Hanner, Robert H.
Humble, Leland M.
Date: Dec-2010
Publisher: Public Library of Science.
Citation: deWaard, J. R., Mitchell, A., Keena, M. A., Gopurenko, D., Boykin, L. M., Armstrong, K. F., et. al. (2010). Towards a global barcode library for Lymantria (Lepidoptera: Lymantriinae) tussock moths of biosecurity concern. PLoS ONE, 5(12), e14280. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014280
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: Background: Detecting and controlling the movements of invasive species, such as insect pests, relies upon rapid and accurate species identification in order to initiate containment procedures by the appropriate authorities. Many species in the tussock moth genus Lymantria are significant forestry pests, including the gypsy moth Lymantria dispar L., and consequently have been a focus for the development of molecular diagnostic tools to assist in identifying species and source populations. In this study we expand the taxonomic and geographic coverage of the DNA barcode reference library, and further test the utility of this diagnostic method, both for species/subspecies assignment and for determination of geographic provenance of populations. Methodology/Principal Findings: Cytochrome oxidase I (COI) barcodes were obtained from 518 individuals and 36 species of Lymantria, including sequences assembled and generated from previous studies, vouchered material in public collections, and intercepted specimens obtained from surveillance programs in Canada. A maximum likelihood tree was constructed, revealing high bootstrap support for 90% of species clusters. Bayesian species assignment was also tested, and resulted in correct assignment to species and subspecies in all instances. The performance of barcoding was also compared against the commonly employed NB restriction digest system (also based on COI); while the latter is informative for discriminating gypsy moth subspecies, COI barcode sequences provide greater resolution and generality by encompassing a greater number of haplotypes across all Lymantria species, none shared between species. Conclusions/Significance: This study demonstrates the efficacy of DNA barcodes for diagnosing species of Lymantria and reinforces the view that the approach is an under-utilized resource with substantial potential for biosecurity and surveillance. Biomonitoring agencies currently employing the NB restriction digest system would gather more information by transitioning to the use of DNA barcoding, a change which could be made relatively seamlessly as the same gene region underlies both protocols.
Persistent URL (URI): http://hdl.handle.net/10182/3668
Related: Originally published at http://www.plosone.org
Related URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014280
ISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014280
Rights: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
Appears in Collections:Bio-Protection Research Centre

Files in this Item

File Description SizeFormat
1-towards_a_global_barcode.pdfArticle in PDF3.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Download
journal.pone.0014280.g001.tifFigure 14.16 MBTIFFView/Download
journal.pone.0014280.g002.tifFigure 2323.96 kBTIFFView/Download
journal.pone.0014280.g003.tifFigure 3827.02 kBTIFFView/Download
journal.pone.0014280.g004.tifFigure 4462.06 kBTIFFView/Download
journal.pone.0014280.g005.tifFigure 52.07 MBTIFFView/Download
journal.pone.0014280.g006.tifFigure 6323.92 kBTIFFView/Download
journal.pone.0014280.s001.pdfFigure S1719.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Download
journal.pone.0014280.s002.pdfAppendix S19.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Download
journal.pone.0014280.s003.pdfTable S1120.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Download
journal.pone.0014280.t001.tifTable 1128.52 kBTIFFView/Download
journal.pone.0014280.t002.tifTable 2483.61 kBTIFFView/Download
journal.pone.0014280.xmlArticle in XML112.47 kBXMLView/Download

Recommend this item

Copyright in individual works within the Research Archive belongs to their authors and/or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. Unless otherwise indicated, all other rights are reserved, except for other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
If you believe that copyright is being infringed by material available in this archive, contact us and we will investigate.