Lincoln University Research Archive LAND where you want to be

Lincoln University > Research Archive > Faculty of Commerce > Department of Agricultural Management and Property Studies >

Cite or link to this item using this URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10182/5033

Title: The significance of financial barriers caused by holding costs in greenfield residential development
Author: Garner, Gary
Date: Jun-2012
Publisher: European Real Estate Society 19th Annual Conference
Citation: Garner, G. O. (2012). The significance of financial barriers caused by holding costs in greenfield residential development. European Real Estate Society 19th Annual Conference, Edinburgh Scotland, 13th-16th June 2012.
Item Type: Conference Contribution - Full Conference Paper
Abstract: Developer infrastructure contributions are regularly cited as the most significant contributor of planning or development costs. However, other non-financial barriers are also emerging as significant impactors. This includes inconsistent planning requirements, development assessment procedures, and conflicts between developers and local councils. Such findings have underpinned a diverse range of planning reforms currently underway in various regions throughout Australia, many of which are specifically designed to target these “non-financial” barriers. Examples include systematic enhancements intended to provide greater standardisation, and reduced administrative requirements, system complexity and timeliness. However, aside from the advent of new infrastructure charging regimes that address cost barriers, it is apparent that these reforms actually address another invasive impact relating to holding costs - rather than the infrastructure charging regime itself. It is indisputable that developer infrastructure costs strongly impact housing costs and therefore affordability: and, compared to holding costs, they are much more visible and easily quantified. In contrast, holding costs may seem less tangible as they typically stem from issues revolving around uncertainty, timeliness and inconsistency. Nonetheless, it can be established that they represent a potentially formidable financial barrier. In determining the impact of holding costs, this paper presents a number of operating scenarios and in the process identifies the financial benefits arising from planning reform and intervention. Whilst in many cases it may be true that development contributions expended towards infrastructure represent the largest planning related cost, their existence also impacts part of the holding cost equation which together with its other elements may be demonstrated to rival apparently more pervasive, obvious costs involved in property development.
Persistent URL (URI): http://hdl.handle.net/10182/5033
Related: http://www.eres.org/
Related URI: Originally published on http://www.eres2012.com/
Rights: Copyright © The Author.
Appears in Collections:Department of Agricultural Management and Property Studies

Files in this Item

File Description SizeFormat
Garner ERES2012_3_09.pdfConference Contribution - Full Conference Paper866.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Download

Recommend this item

Copyright in individual works within the Research Archive belongs to their authors and/or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. Unless otherwise indicated, all other rights are reserved, except for other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
If you believe that copyright is being infringed by material available in this archive, contact us and we will investigate.