Lincoln University >
Research Archive >
Research Centres and Units >
Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit (AERU) >
AERU Research Report series >
Cite or link to this item using this URL:
|Title: ||The decision making of organic and conventional agricultural producers|
|Author: ||Fairweather, John R.|
|Date: ||Jun-1996 |
|Publisher: ||Lincoln University. Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit.|
|Series/Report no.: ||Research report (Lincoln University (Canterbury, N.Z.). Agribusiness & Economics Research Unit) ; no. 233|
|Item Type: ||Monograph|
|Abstract: ||The main objective of this research was to describe and understand the decision making of organic and conventional farmers so
that we could understand why, or why not, they grew organic products. Organic production was self defined by the farmers themselves not by us as experts. We did
not examine whether actual organic standards were being followed. A majority of organic
farmers had their organic status certified by Bio-Gro NZ (the organisation formerly known as the New Zealand Biological Producers and Consumers Association) providing certification in conformity with the basic standards of the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM). Therefore organic farming is defined as any land use which uses organic techniques. It includes agricultural and horticultural land uses and thereby includes both farmers and growers. However, for ease of reading, this report uses the words agriculture and farmer and they should be taken to include horticulture and growers.
This report provides a review of literature on farmers’ decision making with respect to
organic farming. It then introduces and explains the method adopted in this study, namely, the ethnographic decision tree approach. The results are presented in terms of what they tell us about understanding both organic and conventional farmers’ thinking about organic production. Finally, the conclusion discusses the results, compares them with the existing literature, makes some general observations and considers the policy implications.|
|Persistent URL (URI): ||http://hdl.handle.net/10182/521|
|Appears in Collections:||AERU Research Report series|
Copyright in individual works within the Research Archive belongs to their authors and/or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. Unless otherwise indicated, all other rights are reserved, except for other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
If you believe that copyright is being infringed by material available in this archive, contact us and we will investigate.