Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMamboleo, A. A.en
dc.contributor.authorDoscher, Crileen
dc.contributor.authorPaterson, Adrian M.en
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-08T00:16:31Z
dc.date.available2017-03-30en
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.citationMamboleo, A.A., Doscher, C., & Paterson, A. (2017). Are elephants the most disastrous agricultural pests or the agents of ecological restorations? Journal of Biodiversity and Endangered Species, 5(1), 185. doi:10.4172/2332-2543.1000185en
dc.identifier.issn2332-2543en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/10340
dc.description.abstractHuman-elephant interactions occur in the areas where people coexist with elephants. It happens in the communities neighbouring core wildlife protected areas. Human and elephants have coexisted since the beginning of agriculture. The relationship between humans and elephants has deteriorated since humans have increased their dependence on domesticated herbivores and encroached into elephant habitats. The interactions usually result in human deaths, elephant deaths, house demolitions, crop damage and secondary impacts. However, crop damage is the most reported negative impacts from the interactions. In this article, we reviewed the current situation of human-elephant interactions, extent, and nature of elephants' destruction, the contribution of elephants to ecological restorations and players in rural poverty alleviation. We also provided a conclusion on whether elephants are disastrous pests or agents of ecological restoration. Due to the exceptional anatomical, physiological and behavioural features, people perceive elephants as the most disastrous pests and merciless killers. In a similar way, secondary impacts, such as the unfairness of compensation schemes and intangible conservation benefits, influence negative perceptions and attitudes of people towards elephants. Elephants as agents of ecological restoration provide socio-economic benefits to humans through forest management because the seed dispersal of about 400 species of timber and nontimber forest species depend on the digestive tract of elephants. The livelihoods of about 1 billion poor people in the world depend on forests. On the other hand, elephants are not as destructive as other pests such as rodents, wild boars, and starlings, and they are not as killers as hippopotamus and crocodiles. When the positive and negative impacts of human-elephant interactions are summed up, conservation benefits provided to humans usually exceed conservation costs. The mismanagement of elephants leads to increasing negative impacts, if properly managed; elephants may provide significant contributions to environmental conservation and rural poverty alleviation.en
dc.format.extent10en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOMICS Internationalen
dc.relationThe original publication is available from - OMICS International - https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-2543.1000185en
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.4172/2332-2543.1000185en
dc.rights© 2017 Mamboleo AA, et al.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjecthuman-elephant conflicten
dc.subjectagricultural pestsen
dc.subjectecological restorationen
dc.subjectAsian elephantsen
dc.subjecthuman-wildlife conflicten
dc.subjectendangered speciesen
dc.subjectAfrican elephantsen
dc.titleAre elephants the most disastrous agricultural pests or the agents of ecological restorations?en
dc.typeJournal Article
lu.contributor.unitLincoln Universityen
lu.contributor.unitFaculty of Agriculture and Life Sciencesen
lu.contributor.unitPest-Management and Conservationen
lu.contributor.unitFaculty of Environment, Society and Designen
lu.contributor.unitDepartment of Environmental Managementen
lu.contributor.unitResearch Management Officeen
lu.contributor.unit/LU/Research Management Office/2018 PBRF Staff groupen
dc.identifier.doi10.4172/2332-2543.1000185en
dc.subject.anzsrc050202 Conservation and Biodiversityen
dc.subject.anzsrc0602 Ecologyen
dc.subject.anzsrc070308 Crop and Pasture Protection (Pests, Diseases and Weeds)en
dc.subject.anzsrc050211 Wildlife and Habitat Managementen
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Biodiversity and Endangered Speciesen
pubs.issue1en
pubs.notesArticle 185 Date of acceptance: 25 Mar 2017en
pubs.organisational-group/LU
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Agriculture and Life Sciences
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Agriculture and Life Sciences/ECOL
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Faculty of Environment, Society and Design
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Faculty of Environment, Society and Design/DEM
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Research Management Office
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Research Management Office/2018 PBRF Staff group
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
pubs.volume5en
dc.identifier.eissn2332-2543en
dc.rights.licenceAttributionen
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4090-0815


Files in this item

Default Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution