dc.contributor.author | Cullen, Ross | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-27T22:39:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Cullen, R. (2008) Resource endowments, incentives and footprints. EIANZ newsletter, November. | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10182/4835 | |
dc.description.abstract | The recent announcement that New Zealand’s ecological footprint is the sixth largest in the world’ is inaccurate as the words per capita are missing from the headline. Ecological Footprints claim to measure the amount of biologically productive land and water required to produce the goods and services we consume and to absorb the wastes it generates given prevailing technology and resource management. Do Ecological Footprints provide information that is useful for environmental professionals? The ideas in this article provide some insight when reflecting on why New Zealand and Australia are listed as ecological villains. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.rights | Copyright © The Author. | en |
dc.subject | consumption | en |
dc.subject | price | en |
dc.subject | ecological footprints | en |
dc.subject | incentives | en |
dc.title | Resource endowments, incentives and footprints | en |
dc.type | Popular Press / News Item | |
lu.contributor.unit | Lincoln University | en |
lu.contributor.unit | Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences | en |
lu.contributor.unit | Faculty of Agribusiness and Commerce | en |
lu.contributor.unit | Department of Financial and Business Systems | en |
dc.relation.isPartOf | EIANZ New Zealand divisional newsletter | en |
pubs.notes | Non-refereed article published in the EIANZ New Zealand divisional newsletter. | en |
pubs.organisational-group | /LU | |
pubs.organisational-group | /LU/Agriculture and Life Sciences | |
pubs.organisational-group | /LU/Faculty of Agribusiness and Commerce | |
pubs.organisational-group | /LU/Faculty of Agribusiness and Commerce/FABS | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | en |