Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHosking, Colin L.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-30T00:29:17Z
dc.date.available2014-06-30T00:29:17Z
dc.date.issued1982
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/6099
dc.description.abstractBecause we are dealing with two quite different types of walkways, two systems were used, sometimes individually, sometimes in combination. With the rural walkways we adopted an approach of stationing the interviewer at a point where he could intercept most of the people using that walkway. With the city walkways, which have numerous entrance/exit points, the interviewer moved along the walkway. This way we were not just sampling users of one short section. However, both approaches were often combined, to try and achieve the best cover and produce the most unbiased results possible. The method of "working up" the data was to manually transfer it from the questionaires to summary sheets and from there, manually work the data into tables. This method was specifically adopted so that the resulting tables did not become too involved, thus rendering the information too complicated for most. The survey period was 7 January 1981 to 5 July 1981.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Canterburyen
dc.subjectWellingtonen
dc.subjectNew Zealanden
dc.subjectrecreationen
dc.subjectwalkwaysen
dc.subjectplanningen
dc.subjectmaintenanceen
dc.titleWellington district walkways : on the right track? : a recreation survey of two city walkways and two rural walkways in the Wellington districten
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.nameDiploma in Parks and Recreationen
lu.thesis.supervisorDevlin, Pat
lu.contributor.unitDepartment of Social Science, Parks, Recreation, Tourism and Sporten
dc.subject.anzsrc050206 Environmental Monitoringen
dc.subject.anzsrc050205 Environmental Managementen
dc.subject.anzsrc160402 Recreation, Leisure and Tourism Geographyen


Files in this item

Default Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record