Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMao, Longfeien
dc.contributor.authorVerwoerd, Wynand S.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-26T03:18:17Z
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.citationMao, L. & Verwoerd, W. S. (2013). Model-driven elucidation of the inherent capacity of Geobacter sulfurreducens for electricity generation. Journal of Biological Engineering, 7(1). DOI:10.1186/1754-1611-7-14en
dc.identifier.issn0141-5425en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/6474
dc.description.abstractBackground: G. sulfurreducens is one of the commonest microbes used in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) for organic-to-electricity biotransformation. In MFCs based on this microorganism, electrons can be conveyed to the anode via three ways: 1) direct electron transfer (DET) mode, in which electrons of reduced c-type cytochromes in the microbial outer membrane are directly oxidized by the anode; 2) mediated electron transfer (MET) mode, in which the reducing potential available from cell metabolism in the form of NADH is targeted as an electron source for electricity generation with the aid of exogenous mediators; and 3) a putative mixed operation mode involving both electron transfer mechanisms described above (DET and MET). However, the potential of G. sulfurreducens for current output in these three operation modes and the metabolic mechanisms underlying the extraction of the reducing equivalents are still unknown.Results: In this study, we performed flux balance analysis (FBA) of the genome-scale metabolic network to compute the fundamental metabolic potential of G. sulfurreducens for current output that is compatible with reaction stoichiometry, given a realistic nutrient uptake rate. We also developed a method, flux variability analysis with target flux minimization (FATMIN) to eliminate futile NADH cycles. Our study elucidates the possible metabolic strategies to sustain the NADH for current production under the MET and Mixed modes. The results showed that G. sulfurreducens had a potential to output current at up to 3.710 A/gDW for DET mode, 2.711 A/gDW for MET mode and 3.272 A/gDW for a putative mixed MET and DET mode. Compared with DET, which relies on only one contributing reaction, MET and Mixed mode were more resilient with ten and four reactions respectively for high current production.Conclusions: The DET mode can achieve a higher maximum limit of the current output than the MET mode, but the MET has an advantage of higher power output and more flexible metabolic choices to sustain the electric current. The MET and DET modes compete with each other for the metabolic resource for the electricity generation. © 2013 Mao and Verwoerd; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.en
dc.format.extent1-21en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen
dc.relationThe original publication is available from - BioMed Central - https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-7-14en
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-7-14en
dc.rights© 2013 Mao and Verwoerd; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectMFCen
dc.subjectMicrobial fuel cellen
dc.subjectGeobacter sulfurreducensen
dc.subjectBioelectricityen
dc.subjectFlux balance analysisen
dc.subjectFlux variability analysisen
dc.subjectFlux minimizationen
dc.subjectFATMINen
dc.titleModel-driven elucidation of the inherent capacity of Geobacter sulfurreducens for electricity generationen
dc.typeJournal Article
lu.contributor.unitLincoln Universityen
lu.contributor.unitFaculty of Agriculture and Life Sciencesen
lu.contributor.unitDepartment of Wine, Food and Molecular Biosciencesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1754-1611-7-14en
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Biological Engineeringen
pubs.issue14en
pubs.organisational-group/LU
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Agriculture and Life Sciences
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Agriculture and Life Sciences/WFMB
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
pubs.volume7en
dc.rights.licenceAttributionen
dc.rights.licenceAttributionen


Files in this item

Default Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons AttributionCreative Commons Attribution
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons AttributionCreative Commons Attribution