Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRoten, Roryen
dc.contributor.authorPost, Scotten
dc.contributor.authorWerner, Arminen
dc.contributor.authorSafa, Majeeden
dc.contributor.authorHewitt, A. J.en
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-11T22:32:58Z
dc.date.available2017-08-08en
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.citationRoten, R.L., Post, S.L., Werner, A., Safa, M., & Hewitt, A.J. (2017). Phase Doppler quantification of agricultural spray compared with traditional sampling materials. New Zealand Plant Protection, 70, 142-151.en
dc.identifier.issn1175-9003en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/8845
dc.description.abstractThe quantification of spray mass has historically been accomplished by means of fluorescent dyes and various string and ground samplers to capture the dye-laden spray. However, these methods are typically not used in close proximity to orchard sprayers and are prone to many sources of error. The objective of this study was to assess the ability of an in-field phase Doppler (pD) interferometer to quantify spray mass against two common string samplers. Measurements were taken at 0.5 m increments to 4.5 m vertically and 1.0 m increments to 5.0 m downwind from the spray. Converted flux measurements from the strings were compared with those obtained using the pD interferometer. The current pD technology was found to be incapable of collecting equivalent flux data to that obtained from the strings. However, the pD equipment did provide useful data on droplet velocity and size.en
dc.format.extent142-151en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherNew Zealand Plant Protection Society (Inc.)en
dc.relationThe original publication is available from - New Zealand Plant Protection Society (Inc.) - https://doi.org/10.30843/nzpp.2017.70.40 - https://journal.nzpps.org/index.php/nzpp/article/view/40en
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.30843/nzpp.2017.70.40en
dc.rights© 2017 New Zealand Plant Protection Society (Inc.) www.nzpps.org Refer to http://www.nzpps.org/terms_of_use.phpen
dc.subjectspray massen
dc.subjectphase Doppler interferometeren
dc.subjectfluxen
dc.subjectdroplet sizeen
dc.subjectvelocityen
dc.titlePhase Doppler quantification of agricultural spray compared with traditional sampling materialsen
dc.typeJournal Article
lu.contributor.unitLincoln Universityen
lu.contributor.unitFaculty of Agribusiness and Commerceen
lu.contributor.unitDepartment of Land Management and Systemsen
lu.contributor.unitLincoln Agritechen
lu.contributor.unitResearch Management Officeen
lu.contributor.unit/LU/Research Management Office/2018 PBRF Staff groupen
dc.identifier.doi10.30843/nzpp.2017.70.40en
dc.subject.anzsrc0706 Horticultural Productionen
dc.subject.anzsrc079902 Fertilisers and Agrochemicals (Incl. Application)en
dc.subject.anzsrc070308 Crop and Pasture Protection (Pests, Diseases and Weeds)en
dc.subject.anzsrc070603 Horticultural Crop Protection (Pests, Diseases and Weeds)en
dc.subject.anzsrc07 Agricultural And Veterinary Sciencesen
dc.relation.isPartOfNew Zealand Plant Protectionen
pubs.organisational-group/LU
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Faculty of Agribusiness and Commerce
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Faculty of Agribusiness and Commerce/LAMS
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Lincoln Agritech
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Research Management Office
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Research Management Office/2018 PBRF Staff group
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
pubs.publisher-urlhttps://journal.nzpps.org/index.php/nzpp/article/view/40en
pubs.volume70en
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0421-8491
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7608-2098
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0039-8202
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8670-6156


Files in this item

Default Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record