Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHughey, Kenneth F. D.en
dc.contributor.authorJacobson, Christine L.en
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Erin F.en
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-29T22:01:20Z
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.citationHughey, K.F.D., Jacobson, C., & Smith, E.F. (2017). A framework for comparing collaborative management of Australian and New Zealand water resources. Ecology and Society, 22(4), 28. doi:10.5751/ES-09582-220428en
dc.identifier.issn1708-3087en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/8958
dc.description.abstractCollaborative management of natural resources involves two or more parties working together to govern and/or manage a set of resources within a defined area. Although a number of collaborative management frameworks have been developed for protected area and fisheries management, few exist for freshwater resources that enable their comparative analysis. We present a framework of collaborative management for freshwater resources comprising three elements: scope, governance, and management. Application of the framework to 11 cases from Australia and New Zealand differentiates between primarily consultation/government-based arrangements through to cogovernance arrangements. Our framework differs from others because it highlights the multiscalar and nested nature of collaborative management arrangements that influence effective water resource management. Our analysis highlights the diversity of arrangements that exist for freshwater resource management. Cases involving indigenous groups, a social tradition of waterways management, and those outside the scope of national water resource management reforms generally had higher levels of power sharing and involvement. We argue for greater attention to the effectiveness of and links between governance and management processes to ensure collaborative management remains innovative and appropriate to context. We contribute a framework that contains a continua and three core elements that enables a parsimonious evaluation that could be applied to other resource management contexts and, thus avoids criticism of overly prescriptive, simplistic, and idealistic analysis.en
dc.format.extent18en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherResilience Allianceen
dc.relationThe original publication is available from - Resilience Alliance - https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09582-220428en
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09582-220428en
dc.rights© 2017 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. This article is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en
dc.subjectAustraliaen
dc.subjectcogovernanceen
dc.subjectcollaborative managementen
dc.subjectgovernanceen
dc.subjectmanagementen
dc.subjectNew Zealanden
dc.subjectscopeen
dc.subjectwater resourcesen
dc.subjectEcologyen
dc.titleA framework for comparing collaborative management of Australian and New Zealand water resourcesen
dc.typeJournal Article
lu.contributor.unitLincoln Universityen
lu.contributor.unitFaculty of Environment, Society and Designen
lu.contributor.unitDepartment of Environmental Managementen
lu.contributor.unitDepartment of Tourism, Sport and Societyen
lu.contributor.unit/LU/Faculty of Environment, Society and Design/EMGen
lu.contributor.unitResearch Management Officeen
lu.contributor.unit/LU/Research Management Office/2018 PBRF Staff groupen
dc.identifier.doi10.5751/ES-09582-220428en
dc.subject.anzsrc050209 Natural Resource Managementen
dc.subject.anzsrc079901 Agricultural Hydrology (Drainage, Flooding, Irrigation, Quality, Etc.)en
dc.subject.anzsrc060204 Freshwater Ecologyen
dc.subject.anzsrc150303 Corporate Governance and Stakeholder Engagementen
dc.subject.anzsrcMD Multidisciplinaryen
dc.relation.isPartOfEcology and Societyen
pubs.issue4en
pubs.notesArticle number 28en
pubs.organisational-group/LU
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Faculty of Environment, Society and Design
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Faculty of Environment, Society and Design/DEM
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Faculty of Environment, Society and Design/DTSS
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Faculty of Environment, Society and Design/EMG
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Research Management Office
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Research Management Office/2018 PBRF Staff group
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen
pubs.volume22en
dc.identifier.eissn1708-3087en
dc.rights.licenceAttribution-NonCommercialen
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1659-5331


Files in this item

Default Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial