Research@Lincoln
    • Login
     
    View Item 
    •   Research@Lincoln Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Research@Lincoln Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Dairy beef production as an alternative to supplying the dairy company

    Jones, Abigail
    Abstract
    Dairy farmers in New Zealand are vulnerable to changes in milk payout which can be substantial. A potential option for dairy farmers is to alter their system in low payout years to dairy beef, preferentially feeding milk to the calves to achieve higher growth rates so a fodder beet wintering system can be used to finish them at under 18 months of age. High input artificial rearing, continuous milk, nurse cows and dam rearing can all achieve growth rates of ≥1 kg/d. Nurse cows were discounted for reasons of practicality and the other systems were modelled and compared to a traditional dairy replacement rearing system with all calves going into a fodder beet wintering system. Artificial rearing of calves born by 1 August with high levels of milk fed is the alternative system recommended for dairy beef as it achieves live weight targets going on to fodder beet and at slaughter. Males finished at 553.7 kg live weight (310.0 kg carcass weight) and heifers at 497.5 kg live weight (271.0 kg carcass weight) were analysed at a range of milk and beef prices with profits per head of -$39.72 to $879.78 for males and -$215.22 to $626.28 for heifers. Artificial rearing of calves born by 1 September failed to achieve live weight targets by 1 April and then 25 December. Traditional dairy replacement rearing was the most profitable, but failed to achieve live weight targets and was used more to show how ecconomic the system for rearing replacement is compared with systems prioritising growth. Of the alternative systems dam rearing was the most profitable with profits per head of $26.77 to $1,025.02 for males and -$139.74 to $784.52 for heifers, but was not recommended on the basis of practicality and a shortage of supporting evidence. Continuous mik was the last profitable with profits per head of -$167.34 to $805.41 for males and -$342.84 to $ 551.91 for heifers. Heifers were less profitable than steers or bulls because of their lower growth rates and carcass weight percentages (54.5% vs. 56%). Provided calves can be grown fast enough for slaughter before their second winter dairy beef can be a profitable alternative to sending milk to the dairy company at appropriate milk and beef payouts. It should be practical for farmers to adapt their systems temporarily to increase profitability.... [Show full abstract]
    Keywords
    calf growth rates; average daily gain; milk feeding; fodder beet; economics; high input milk rearing; continuous milk; dam rearing; multiple suckling; nurse cows; replacement rearing; free contact system; natural suckling; beef finishing; milk payout; beef schedules
    Fields of Research
    07 Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences; 070106 Farm Management, Rural Management and Agribusiness; 070203 Animal Management
    Date
    2017-07-01
    Type
    Dissertation
    Collections
    • Dissertations [384]
    • Department of Agricultural Sciences [1215]
    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Jones_BAgrSc(Hons).pdf (1.723Mb)
    Permalink
    https://hdl.handle.net/10182/9016
    Metadata
     Expand record
    This service is managed by Library, Teaching and Learning
    • Archive Policy
    • Copyright and Reuse
    • Deposit Guidelines and FAQ
    • Contact Us
     

     

    Browse

    All of Research@LincolnCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsKeywordsBy Issue DateThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsKeywordsBy Issue Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics
    This service is managed by Library, Teaching and Learning
    • Archive Policy
    • Copyright and Reuse
    • Deposit Guidelines and FAQ
    • Contact Us