Managerial competencies in primary production : the view of consultants and other professionals
Citations
Altmetric:
Authors
Date
2002-12
Type
Other
Fields of Research
Abstract
Primary production is based on the use of three major resources, land, labour and capital. But
the efficiency of the production depends on a fourth critical resource, the skill level of the
person making decisions on how the resources should be used (managerial skill). Survey records show there is a very wide range of levels of profitability achieved,
presumably due to a wide range in managerial skill levels. Over 1999-2000 return on capital
for sheep and cattle farms averaged 2.6% but with a range of -5% to over +9%. These observations lead to the question of whether the general level of managerial skills can
be improved through training programmes. To institute such programmes it is necessary to
know the important competences (skills) that should be targeted. To obtain the views of consultants and other professionals on important managerial
competencies a survey of all members of the NZ Institute of Primary Industry Management
was conducted. The mail survey of 708 members obtained 339 useable replies. Respondents were asked to rate the importance of a wide range of competencies grouped into
classes termed 'Managerial Attributes', 'Entrepreneurial Skills', and 'Personal Attributes'. In
addition, respondents were asked to give details of their interests, age, education, views on
farmer computer use and preferable training mechanisms. They were also asked to respond
to a group of 25 questions designed to classify their individual management style. An important finding was there was little difference in the respondents' views on important
competencies with variations in age, education, farm type interest, style and self-assessed
intelligence. The four most important 'Managerial Attributes’ were: a) ability to identify the key factors in a problem, b) effective communication (with employees and contractors), c) being up to date with the current condition of the property (bank balance, animal condition, crop growth, soil moisture), d) assessing job priorities.
The four most important 'Entrepreneurial Skills’ were: a) understanding deadlines and being able to ‘act in time’, b) an ability and determination to look/ask/seek out information thought to be necessary for making decisions, c) ability in learning new skills, d) understanding sources of risk and what can be done to reduce its impact.
The four most important ‘Personal Attributes’ were: a) early observations of important indicators around the farm (eg lambs are scouring, wheat is
infected), b) ability to learn from experience, mistakes and failures, c) developing a ‘good moral character; involving openness, integrity, reliability, and trustworthiness, d) having the confidence to draw conclusions and act quickly and decisively. When the full list of 45 competencies (managerial attributes, entrepreneurial skills and
personal attributes) were combined and analysed for correlations it was found that the
following groupings formed an important 'kit bag' of attributes: a) understanding deadlines, acting on time and having anticipatory skills, b) obtaining relevant information and recognising problems and opportunities, c) understanding risk and what to do about it, d) identifying key factors, e) understanding how to choose between alternatives and ensuring ALL are considered, f) effective communication and good negotiation skills, g) ability to learn new skills and learn from experience, h) knowing the current state of the property, i) ability to develop long and short term plans, j) an ability to picture the consequences of decisions and to assess job priorities, and k) a belief that the farm is under the manager's control.
It would be desirable to develop interactive computer based training packages to assist
managers in improving these skills or competencies.
The respondents believed farmers would prefer tutor supported locally based competency
training programmes. However, this would be a very costly exercise so computer based
packages would be more practical (and the second preference).
A similar survey of over 700 farmers is currently being analysed to see whether farmers have
the same views as the NZIPIM respondents. The two surveys should give a clear indication
of the competencies the industry believes are important.
In analysing the responses of 25 questions on managerial style it was clear five basic factors
could be used to categorise style. These were called 'anxious responsibility', 'careful
logician', 'consultative', 'obsessive professionalism' and 'lively professionalism':
Everyone will exhibit a degree of each of these characteristics. These characteristics
might influence a person's managerial ability and the best competency training methods.
As farmers' objectives may impact on appropriate competence and training packages, the
respondents were asked to rank a range of statements. The top four were: a) planning for the maximum possible sustainable cash return, b) producing products and using farming systems that the farmer really enjoys being involved with, c) planning for the maximum possible average annual increase in the net value of total assets, d) selecting farming systems that minimise risk.
Following the results from the farmers' survey, the next step in the work will involve deciding
on the competencies to target in training programmes. This stage will need farmer
involvement. The development of the training programmes and their testing for effectiveness
will then follow.