Social Investment Fund : case studies of sub-projects in southern Thailand
Citations
Altmetric:
Authors
Date
2004
Type
Thesis
Fields of Research
Abstract
The Social Investment Fund (SIF) programme was funded by the World Bank in
response to the Thai government’s attempt to alleviate poverty for people, who were
affected socially and economically by the economic crisis in Thailand in mid-1997
(SOFO, n.d.; World Bank, 2001). The programme planned to use a participatory
approach to increase their well-being by promoting long-term self-reliance and
empowerment.
People’s livelihoods are complex, diverse, and can be influenced by multiple-factors
such as social structure, policies, processes, seasonality, and access and control of life
sustaining capital. To successfully improve people’s livelihoods and alleviate poverty,
their multiple needs have to be satisfied.
The research used semi-structured interviews and focus groups to obtain research
results. The research was conducted with three communities in Southern Thailand:
Naa Moon Sri, Naa Kao Sia, and Baan Tae Rum to evaluate whether the SIF
programme improved the livelihoods of the people in the communities and whether
the people achieved the same level of assistance and support from the SIF that could
lead to success of their sub-projects.
Research findings and lessons learnt could be useful for future development. Major
findings were that the evaluation of success is not straightforward, as different
authorities defined success differently and because the sub-projects in the
communities were at different stages of development. The level of the SIF’s support
also affected success of the sub-projects. The SIF focused more on facilitating
networks between communities and outside organisations and did not facilitate
participation among people within the communities. Thus, it operated more effectively when a sub-project was established upon existing communal groups. For sub-projects,
those that learn to cope with their vulnerability better can become more successful.
The communities’ projects can be more successful and sustainable if their project
members can equally participate throughout the overall process of their project’s
development. Communication, trust, and networking among the community members
themselves and between the communities and development organisations can also
reduce their vulnerability and lead to success and sustainability of their projects.
Permalink
Source DOI
Rights
Creative Commons Rights
Access Rights
Digital thesis can be viewed by current staff and students of Lincoln University only. If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.