Research@Lincoln
    • Login
     
    View Item 
    •   Research@Lincoln Home
    • Metadata-only (no full-text)
    • Metadata-only (no full-text)
    • View Item
    •   Research@Lincoln Home
    • Metadata-only (no full-text)
    • Metadata-only (no full-text)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Enablers and barriers to vineyard/winery land sparing/sharing green infrastructure strategies

    McWilliam, Wendy J.
    Abstract
    In some wine regions vineyard landscapes have thrived over long periods of time as biodiverse vegetation communities. Changing policies and market conditions have led to their simplification, and, although more productive, these systems are criticised for their negative social, cultural and ecological consequences. Two alternative production strategies have been debated (for intensive agricultural systems in general) to conserve or restore at least some of the ecosystem services of traditional systems. In a land sparing strategy, large areas of monoculture vineyards are focused on the most capable land and marginal areas are set aside for nature conservation. However, this system is criticised for mitigating few intensive system environmental impacts and for its infrequent implementation among landowners who see few benefits to setting aside their land for nature conservation. A second alternative is the conservation or restoration of some of the elements of traditional land sharing strategies that integrate green infrastructure (non-vine vegetation) into the vineyard production systems rather than segregate it. However, these systems may to be less productive, less efficient, and riskier. They also may not be implemented if they do not provide sufficient benefit to vineyard owners. There is a need for studies that evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of alternative systems toward the identification of more sustainable alternatives. Toward that end, in-depth, semi-structured, face to face interviews were conducted with vineyard owners and managers of Willamette valley, Oregon, U.S. vineyards to evaluate their combined sparing and sharing strategy. Questions answered include: What green infrastructure is in place? What services/disservices does it provide? Why do vineyards conserve and restore it? What are the enablers and barriers to its conservation and restoration? And, what lessons can be learned to advance the conservation and restoration of more biodiverse vineyard systems while ensuring an acceptable level of production?... [Show full abstract]
    Keywords
    winery land
    Type
    Conference Contribution - unpublished (Conference Oral Presentation)
    Collections
    • Metadata-only (no full-text) [4837]
    View/Open
    Share this

    on Twitter on Facebook on LinkedIn on Reddit on Tumblr by Email

    Metadata
     Expand record
    This service is maintained by Learning, Teaching and Library
    • Archive Policy
    • Copyright and Reuse
    • Deposit Guidelines and FAQ
    • Contact Us
     

     

    Browse

    All of Research@LincolnCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsKeywordsBy Issue DateThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsKeywordsBy Issue Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics
    This service is maintained by Learning, Teaching and Library
    • Archive Policy
    • Copyright and Reuse
    • Deposit Guidelines and FAQ
    • Contact Us