Research@Lincoln
    • Login
     
    View Item 
    •   Research@Lincoln Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations with Restricted Access
    • View Item
    •   Research@Lincoln Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations with Restricted Access
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Social Investment Fund : case studies of sub-projects in southern Thailand

    Sunaseweenonta, Vorajit
    Abstract
    The Social Investment Fund (SIF) programme was funded by the World Bank in response to the Thai government’s attempt to alleviate poverty for people, who were affected socially and economically by the economic crisis in Thailand in mid-1997 (SOFO, n.d.; World Bank, 2001). The programme planned to use a participatory approach to increase their well-being by promoting long-term self-reliance and empowerment. People’s livelihoods are complex, diverse, and can be influenced by multiple-factors such as social structure, policies, processes, seasonality, and access and control of life sustaining capital. To successfully improve people’s livelihoods and alleviate poverty, their multiple needs have to be satisfied. The research used semi-structured interviews and focus groups to obtain research results. The research was conducted with three communities in Southern Thailand: Naa Moon Sri, Naa Kao Sia, and Baan Tae Rum to evaluate whether the SIF programme improved the livelihoods of the people in the communities and whether the people achieved the same level of assistance and support from the SIF that could lead to success of their sub-projects. Research findings and lessons learnt could be useful for future development. Major findings were that the evaluation of success is not straightforward, as different authorities defined success differently and because the sub-projects in the communities were at different stages of development. The level of the SIF’s support also affected success of the sub-projects. The SIF focused more on facilitating networks between communities and outside organisations and did not facilitate participation among people within the communities. Thus, it operated more effectively when a sub-project was established upon existing communal groups. For sub-projects, those that learn to cope with their vulnerability better can become more successful. The communities’ projects can be more successful and sustainable if their project members can equally participate throughout the overall process of their project’s development. Communication, trust, and networking among the community members themselves and between the communities and development organisations can also reduce their vulnerability and lead to success and sustainability of their projects.... [Show full abstract]
    Keywords
    development; sustainable livelihoods; networking; Social Investment Fund (SIF); empowerment; multiple needs; vulnerability; community development; poverty
    Date
    2004
    Type
    Thesis
    Access Rights
    Digital thesis can be viewed by current staff and students of Lincoln University only. Print copy available for reading in Lincoln University Library.
    Collections
    • Department of Land Management and Systems [383]
    • Theses and Dissertations with Restricted Access [2207]
    Share this

    on Twitter on Facebook on LinkedIn on Reddit on Tumblr by Email

    View/Open
    Staff/student login to read
    Metadata
     Expand record
    This service is managed by Learning, Teaching and Library
    • Archive Policy
    • Copyright and Reuse
    • Deposit Guidelines and FAQ
    • Contact Us
     

     

    Browse

    All of Research@LincolnCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsKeywordsBy Issue DateThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsKeywordsBy Issue Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics
    This service is managed by Learning, Teaching and Library
    • Archive Policy
    • Copyright and Reuse
    • Deposit Guidelines and FAQ
    • Contact Us