Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFountain, Joanna M.en
dc.contributor.authorCradock-Henry, N. A.en
dc.contributor.authorBuelow, F.en
dc.contributor.authorRennie, Hamishen
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-29T04:19:23Z
dc.date.available2021-01-01en
dc.date.issued2021-04-14en
dc.identifier.issn1083-5423en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/13746
dc.description.abstractOn November 14, 2016 an earthquake struck the rural districts of Kaikōura and Hurunui on New Zealand’s South Island. The region—characterized by small dispersed communities, a local economy based on tourism and agriculture, and limited transportation connections—was severely impacted. Following the quake, road and rail networks essential to maintaining steady flows of goods, visitors, and services were extensively damaged, leaving agrifood producers with significant logistical challenges, resulting in reduced productivity and problematic market access. Regional tourism destinations also suffered with changes to the number, characteristics, and travel patterns of visitors. As the region recovers, there is renewed interest in the development and promotion of agrifood tourism and trails as a pathway for enhancing rural resilience, and a growing awareness of the importance of local networks. Drawing on empirical evidence and insights from a range of affected stakeholders, including food producers, tourism operators, and local government, we explore the significance of emerging agrifood tourism initiatives for fostering diversity, enhancing connectivity, and building resilience in the context of rural recovery. We highlight the motivation to diversify distribution channels for agrifood producers, and strengthen the region’s tourism place identity. Enhancing product offerings and establishing better links between different destinations within the region are seen as essential. While such trends are common in rural regions globally, we suggest that stakeholders’ shared experience with the earthquake and its aftermath has opened up new opportunities for regeneration and reimagination, and has influenced current agrifood tourism trajectories. In particular, additional funding for tourism recovery marketing and product development after the earthquake, and an emphasis on greater connectivity between the residents and communities through strengthening rural networks and building social capital within and between regions, is enabling more resilient and sustainable futures.en
dc.format.extent135-149en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCognizant Communication Corporationen
dc.relationThe original publication is available from - Cognizant Communication Corporation - https://doi.org/10.3727/108354221X16079839951420en
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3727/108354221X16079839951420en
dc.rights© 2021 Cognizant, LLC.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.subjectagrifood tourismen
dc.subjectNew Zealanden
dc.subjectpostdisaster recoveryen
dc.subjectrural resilienceen
dc.titleAgrifood tourism, rural resilience, and recovery in a postdisaster context: Insights and evidence from Kaikōura-Hurunui, New Zealanden
dc.typeJournal Article
lu.contributor.unitLincoln Universityen
lu.contributor.unitFaculty of Environment, Society and Designen
lu.contributor.unitDepartment of Environmental Managementen
lu.contributor.unitDepartment of Tourism, Sport and Societyen
dc.identifier.doi10.3727/108354221X16079839951420en
dc.subject.anzsrc15 Commerce, Management, Tourism and Servicesen
dc.subject.anzsrc150604 Tourism Marketingen
dc.subject.anzsrc150309 Logistics and Supply Chain Managementen
dc.relation.isPartOfTourism Analysisen
pubs.issue2-3en
pubs.notesThis article was made available online on 1 January 2021 as a Fast Track article with title: "Agri-food tourism, rural resilience, and recovery in a post-disaster context: insights and evidence from Kaikōura-Hurunui, New Zealand". doi links to : https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/cog/ta/2021/00000026/f0020002/art00004en
pubs.organisational-group/LU
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Faculty of Environment, Society and Design
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Faculty of Environment, Society and Design/DEM
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Faculty of Environment, Society and Design/DTSS
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Research Management Office
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Research Management Office/PE20
pubs.organisational-group/LU/Research Management Office/QE18
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
pubs.volume26en
dc.identifier.eissn1943-3999en
dc.rights.licenceAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivativesen
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2556-3216
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9247-6625
dc.subject.anzsrc2020359999 Other commerce, management, tourism and services not elsewhere classifieden
dc.subject.anzsrc2020350804 Tourism marketingen
dc.subject.anzsrc2020350909 Supply chainsen
dc.subject.anzsrc2020440406 Rural community developmenten
dc.subject.anzsrc2020350703 Disaster and emergency managementen
dc.subject.anzsrc2020350803 Tourism managementen


Files in this item

Default Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives