Research@Lincoln
    • Login
     
    View Item 
    •   Research@Lincoln Home
    • Faculty of Environment, Society and Design
    • Department of Tourism, Sport and Society
    • View Item
    •   Research@Lincoln Home
    • Faculty of Environment, Society and Design
    • Department of Tourism, Sport and Society
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Halting indigenous biodiversity decline: ambiguity, equity, and outcomes in RMA assessment of significance

    Walker, S.; Brower, Ann L.; Clarkson, B.; Lee, W.; Myers, S.; Shaw, W.; Stephens, T.
    Abstract
    In New Zealand, assessment of ‘significance’ is undertaken to give effect to a legal requirement for local authorities to provide for protection of significant sites under the Resource Management Act (1991). The ambiguity of the statute enables different interests to define significance according to their goals: vested interests (developers), local authorities, and non-vested interests in pursuit of protection of environmental public goods may advance different definitions. We examine two sets of criteria used for assessment of significance for biological diversity under the Act. Criteria adapted from the 1980s Protected Natural Areas Programme are inadequate to achieve the maintenance of biological diversity if ranking is used to identify only highest priority sites. Norton and Roper-Lindsay (2004) propose a narrow definition of significance, and criteria that identify only a few high-quality sites as significant. Both sets are likely to serve the interests of developers and local authorities, but place the penalty of uncertainty on non-vested interests seeking to maintain biological diversity, and are likely to exacerbate the decline of biological diversity and the loss of landscape-scale processes required for its persistence. When adopting criteria for assessment of significance, we suggest local authorities should consider whose interests are served by different criteria sets, and who will bear the penalty of uncertainty regarding biological diversity outcomes. They should also ask whether significance criteria are adequate, and sufficiently robust to the uncertainty inherent in the assessment of natural values, to halt the decline of indigenous biological diversity.... [Show full abstract]
    Keywords
    collective action; conservation evaluation; interests; precautionary principle; representativeness; uncertainty; biological diversity; Ecology
    Fields of Research
    0602 Ecology
    Date
    2008-08-27
    Type
    Journal Article
    Collections
    • Department of Tourism, Sport and Society [625]
    Share this

    on Twitter on Facebook on LinkedIn on Reddit on Tumblr by Email

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    brower_biodiversity_decline.pdf
    Metadata
     Expand record
    Copyright © New Zealand Ecological Society.
    Citation
    Walker, S., Brower, A. L., Clarkson, B. D., Lee, W. G., Myers, S. C., Shaw, W. B., & Stephens, R. T. T. (2008). Halting indigenous biodiversity decline: ambiguity, equity, and outcomes in RMA assessment of significance. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 32(2), 225-237.
    This service is managed by Learning, Teaching and Library
    • Archive Policy
    • Copyright and Reuse
    • Deposit Guidelines and FAQ
    • Contact Us
     

     

    Browse

    All of Research@LincolnCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsKeywordsBy Issue DateThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsKeywordsBy Issue Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics
    This service is managed by Learning, Teaching and Library
    • Archive Policy
    • Copyright and Reuse
    • Deposit Guidelines and FAQ
    • Contact Us