Item

Some aspects of herbage quality in Canterbury high and hill country pastures

Clarke, D. G.
Date
1977
Type
Thesis
Fields of Research
Abstract
A current review of some general aspects of herbage quality and its evaluation is presented. It is concluded that the two-stage in vitro digestion procedure is a reliable predictor of in vivo digestibility, and that the more time-consuming chemical analyses can be used to indicate changes in the herbage which may explain observed digestibility changes. In a four-year study at Mesopotamia Station, South Canterbury, there was little evidence to suggest that early closing and fertiliser treatment of high country pastures, either individually or together will improve the supply of available herbage in the following spring. On the contrary continued grazing of pastures to June not only resulted in more forage being available to the grazing animal but a significant improvement in the quality of herbage was observed. The only observed gain as a result of early closing was an increase in the yield of cocksfoot in the subsequent spring. The application of superphosphate at the rate of 400 kg/ha had little effect in increasing the yield and quality of the total sward although indications suggest that for a more sustained period this effect may have been significant. The high quality of clover, cocksfoot and Yorkshire fog in this environment is indicated. Brown-top and sweet vernal also gave high digestibility values in spring and the former maintained its quality into summer but was inferior to sweet vernal in the autumn. The digestibility of the available herbage under a continuous grazing management system for four seasons on a hill country site at Coopers Creek, North Canterbury, was investigated. Values improved from 70% in early spring to 80% in the late-spring/early-summer period. This was followed by a general decline to 50-60% by January and further trends appeared to be related to autumn rainfall patterns. In dry autumns the summer decline in digestibility continued to winter, while in higher rainfall autumns the digestibility was maintained, if not improved during autumn before a decline to winter. The accumulation of dead matter was generally related to lower digestibility values and it is clear that the dynamics of pasture growth and decay playa large role in the quality of standing herbage in both the hill and high country. Improved digestibility values during summer and autumn were established when the herbage was closed from grazing for six to eight week periods, largely due to the accumulation of new growth. The digestibility of herbage grown on different soil variants of an Hurunui steepland soil showed no major differences except the improved digestibility of herbage grown in areas used as stock-camps. Generally little difference was noted in the digestibility of pastures grown on a sunny or shady aspect during spring, although shady aspect herbage was 5-8% lower in early spring. During late summer and autumn, pastures tended to be superior in quality on the shady aspect but as winter approached the ranking was reversed. Expressed on a dry matter basis the chemical composition of herbage grown at Coopers Creek was in the ranges, 14-20% for cellulose, 10-15% for hemicellulose, 2-5% for pectin, 8-12% for soluble sugars, 5-7% for lignin and 15-19% for crude protein, at the dates studied, With the exception of phosphorus and sodium all the minerals analysed for, were present in adequate amounts for good pasture growth, Best relationships between chemical composition and digestibility were found for cell wall % and crude protein % (r = 0.79). The fact that these relationships were closer when the data were analysed separately for each harvest date prompted in part, an investigation on the use of a capacitance meter to predict the yield of digestible dry matter. The data presented show promising indications.
Source DOI
Rights
https://researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz/pages/rights
Creative Commons Rights
Access Rights
Digital thesis can be viewed by current staff and students of Lincoln University only. If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.