Research@Lincoln
    • Login
     
    View Item 
    •   Research@Lincoln Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations with Restricted Access
    • View Item
    •   Research@Lincoln Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations with Restricted Access
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Coliform bacteria in an aerobic sewage treatment plant: their survival and significance as water quality indicators

    Pyle, B. H.
    Abstract
    An attempt was made to determine if coliform bacteria populations in an aerobic sewage treatment plant changed in species composition and if there were any changes in their characteristics. Bacteria were isolated on media with minimal selectivity which relied on utilisation of glucose rather than lactose. Spread plate (SP) and membrane filtration (MF) methods were used and compared with coliform MF methods. To test whether there was a change in the coliform population during sewage treatment, fifty morphological and biochemical tests were carried out on each isolate. The results were analysed by computing Euclidean distances and using complete linkage for numerical classifications to form clusters of isolates with similar characteristics. Clusters were identified by the inclusion of reference cultures of Enterobacteriaceae and by identification of a selection of isolates by API 20E methods. Of the 857 isolates characterised and classified, 369 (43.1%) were identified as Escherichia, Citrobacter, Enterobacter or Klebsiella spp. The SP and MF methods with glucose-containing media (PRGA-SP and TGEA/PRGB-MF) detected fewer false-positive coliform bacteria than the coliform MF method using M-Endo LES agar. Average numbers of E. coli in raw and treated sewage were 4.2 x 10⁵/ml and 1.7 x 10³/ml respectively; numbers of Citrobacter, Enterobacter arid K1ebsiella spp. Together were on average 1.2 x 10⁶/ml and 1.0 x 10⁴/ml respectively. Numbers of bacteria in clusters in which E. coli; were placed were reduced by 99.4 - 99.7% during sewage treatment, and those in clusters of Citrobacter, Enterobacter and Klebsiella spp. by 95.9-99.8%. Isolates in some clusters of these four genera were better able to survive during sewage treatment than others. E coli declined in proportion to the whole coliform population. The numbers of bacteria represented by each cluster fluctuated markedly with time, suggesting a succession of species and biotypes of bacteria in sewage. In most cases, bacteria isolated in treated sewage were detected in raw sewage sampled at the same time, suggesting that removal of bacteria during sewage treatment was more likely than growth of any particular biotypes. Discriminant analysis showed that there were small but significant differences between isolates from raw or treated sewage and those isolated by different methods. Biotypes of E. coli, Citrobacter, Enterobacter and Klebsiella spp. detected by the coliform and faecal coliform membrane filter methods could be distinguished most clearly from those isolated by the PRGA-SP and TGEA/PRGB-MF methods. E. coli was the only species which could be clearly and easily separated from other coliform bacteria and species of other genera using a modified IMViC scheme. Other coliform bacteria could not be separated. Isolates identified as E. coli were placed in four separate clusters, i.e., distinct biotypes. It was concluded that because E.coli could be most easily identified, is the most numerous coliform bacterium in faeces and the least likely to multiply in natural situations outside the gut, it should be a valid indicator of faecal contamination, even after sewage treatment.... [Show full abstract]
    Keywords
    faecal coliforms; aerobic; sewage; effluent; water quality; indicator bacteria; sewage treatment
    Fields of Research
    060501 Bacteriology; 050206 Environmental Monitoring
    Date
    1984
    Type
    Thesis
    Access Rights
    Digital thesis can be viewed by current staff and students of Lincoln University only. If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.
    Collections
    • Theses and Dissertations with Restricted Access [2370]
    • Department of Wine, Food and Molecular Biosciences [716]
    View/Open
    Staff/student login to read
    Share this

    on Twitter on Facebook on LinkedIn on Reddit on Tumblr by Email

    Metadata
     Expand record
    This service is maintained by Learning, Teaching and Library
    • Archive Policy
    • Copyright and Reuse
    • Deposit Guidelines and FAQ
    • Contact Us
     

     

    Browse

    All of Research@LincolnCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsKeywordsBy Issue DateThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsKeywordsBy Issue Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics
    This service is maintained by Learning, Teaching and Library
    • Archive Policy
    • Copyright and Reuse
    • Deposit Guidelines and FAQ
    • Contact Us