Probable health effects associated with base stations in communities: the need for health surveys
Abstract
In 1995 a New Zealand Environment Court (as the Planning Tribunal) decided to set a public exposure
limit of 2mW/cm² for from a BellSouth GSM cell site. This was based on evidence of biological
effects, including calcium ion efflux, enhanced ODC activity and EEG change down to 2.9mW/cm².
There was also epidemiological evidence of childhood leukaemia at 2.4mW/cm². The primary expert
witness for BellSouth was WHO staff member Dr Michael Repacholi from Australia. He stated that
there was no evidence of adverse effects below the international guideline of SAR = 0.08W/kg because
the only effect of RF/MW was tissue heating. The Court's decision rejected this position and
set the exposure level of 1% of the standard. The decision also stated that this should be revised
with new evidence. Subsequently two Australian studies were carried out to assure the public that
both cell phones and cell sites were safe. Both of these studies, Hocking et al. (1996) and Repacholi
et al. (1997), showed that leukaemia/lymphoma was more than doubled for people and mice.
It is now clear that the results of both of these were quite predicable from earlier human and rodent
studies. This includes studies that are claimed by ICNIRP, WHO and Dr Repacholi (both in reviews
and in the Environment Court) to show that there were no adverse effects. To this day cell phone
companies and some government bodies, such as the U.K independent expert committee, chaired by
Sir William Stewart, that included Dr Repacholi, still claims that there is no evidence that cell phone
radiation is harmful. There is a large and growing body of published scientific studies that show that
this is not true. This includes Dr Repacholi's own research. Over forty cell phone radiation studies are
cited here. They show that cell phone radiation mimics the biological and epidemiological studies for
EMR over the past 4 decades. This includes DNA strand breakage, chromosome aberrations, increased
oncogene activity in cells, reduced melatonin, altered brain activity, altered blood pressure and
increased brain cancer.
Analogue cell phones use FM RF/MW signals and digital cell phones use pulsed microwaves that are
very similar to radar signals. FM radio, TV signals and radar exposures cause significant and dose
response increases in brain cancer, leukaemia and other cancers, and cardiac, neurological and reproductive
health effects. Hence it is highly probable that cell sites and cell phones are causing many
adverse health effects. Already cell phone radiation has been shown to significantly increase all these
effects.
Public health surveys of people living in the vicinity of cell site base stations should be being carried
out now, and continue progressively over the next two decades. This is because prompt effects such
as miscarriage, cardiac disruption, sleep disturbance and chronic fatigue could well be early indicators
of the adverse health effects. Symptoms of reduced immune system competence, cardiac problems,
especially of the arrhythmic type and cancers, especially brain tumour and leukaemia are probable.
However, since cell phone radiation has already been shown to reduce melatonin, damage DNA and
chromosomes, surveys should look for a very wide range health effects and not be limited to a narrow
set. In carrying out health surveys, the researchers must be mindful of the actual and realistic
radiation patterns from cell sites and not to make the mistake of assuming a simple, uniform radial
pattern.... [Show full abstract]
Keywords
cancer; human health effects; cell phone sitesDate
2000-06Type
Conference Contribution - Published (Conference Paper)Collections
Copyright © The Author.