Item

The effects of social and institutional structures on decision-making and benefit distribution of community forestry in Nepal : A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Lincoln University, New Zealand

Yadav, Bhagwan Dutta
Date
2013
Type
Thesis
Fields of Research
ANZSRC::050205 Environmental Management , ANZSRC::160403 Social and Cultural Geography
Abstract
Participatory democracy has been an official part of Community Forestry (CF) since 1989 when the main policy document, the Master Plan for the Forestry Sector (MPFS), was introduced in Nepal. However, many problems related to benefit distribution from CF have emerged because of the way decision-making is influenced by the social and institutional structures present at the community level, particularly in terms of dominance by wealthy and caste elite and the inability of poor and disadvantaged households to participate fully in decisions. The purpose of the study is to investigate the potential for poor and disadvantaged households to have positions on the Executive Committee (EC) of the Community Forestry User Group (CFUG), and whether representation of the poor and disadvantaged on the EC has any influence on the distribution of CF products or the formulation of distribution rules. The study used a conceptual approach using elite theory with models that looked at EC decisions based on whether there was a single caste in the CFUG or multiple castes, and whether only rich households were on the EC or whether a mix of rich and poor households were on the EC. Rich and/or high caste individuals, typically identified with EC membership, would interact on the EC either as a consensually integrated elite where there was one caste, or a plural elite where there was a mix of castes. A mix of rich and poor households on the EC was characterised as an organisational elite model, in which the EC organisation provided power and influence to members of the EC, including the poor, thus providing a balance to the dominance by the traditional elite. The study uses CFUG-level data from 31 CFUGs in the Baglung district and household data from 310 households. The results of the study show that while the usual factors associated with wealth and caste are important for selection to EC leadership positions, NGO membership was also an important factor EC leadership positions. The importance of NGO membership is that it means that NGOs and civil organisations are able to strengthen the leadership capabilities of poorer and disadvantaged people or encourage/empower someone to be an EC member through training, workshops and study tours. This finding also supports the concept of the organisational elite model. The study also examined the effect of representation of the poor and disadvantaged on the EC by studying the factors that determined the relative distribution of forest products and the rules of distribution. In both cases, the higher the representation of the poor and disadvantage on the EC, the greater the benefits to the poor, both in terms of greater quantities distributed and longer distribution or collection periods. The policy implication of the study is that there is a way to overcome the traditional domination of the EC by the local elite through greater activity of NGOs, CBOs and civil society organisations. These organisations help the poor and underprivileged households to build up capacity to undertake leadership roles and through the organisational elite model become part of the elite decision-making.
Source DOI
Rights
https://researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz/pages/rights
Creative Commons Rights
Access Rights