Research@Lincoln
    • Login
     
    View Item 
    •   Research@Lincoln Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Research@Lincoln Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    An investigation of the incorporation of a standoff facility with the grazing of fodder beet in a Canterbury dairy wintering system

    Brown, N. M.
    Abstract
    Dairy farmers are under scrutiny for the negative effect their farming operations have on the environment, particularly in regard to nitrate leaching. The National Policy Statement for Freshwater has directed regional councils to set limits for nutrient losses by 2030. Of particular interest are the traditional fodder crop wintering systems which have a higher density of urine patches at times of greater drainage. Since plant demand is low, high levels of nitrate leaching result. Current proposed alternative strategies, such as shed housing can have a large initial cost, with impacts on the financial viability of the business. This project investigated the environmental and economic effects of a fodder beet/standoff pad wintering system as an alternative to the current Lincoln University Dairy Farm (LUDF) forage crop wintering system, where all crop/supplement are fed in paddock. These systems were modelled using partial budgets for the winter period and analysis in Overseer® version 6.1.3 to quantify the economic and environmental effects. In the models, 400 cows were either grazed 24 hours per day on the crop with silage, or an alternative system which restricted grazed fodder beet for six hours per day for the 61 day period, with silage fed on a pad that collects all effluent. In both case the cows were allocated 8 kg DM per cow of fodder beet. For the paddock option, they were allocated 6 kg DM of silage and on the pad 4.8 kg DM of silage (due to better utilisation). This analysis concluded that the proposed system cost $41.07 per cow per week, which was 82.3% more expensive than the historical system at $22.53 per cow per week. The proposed system’s levels of nitrogen lost to water were 56.9% lower than the historical system, with losses of 28 kg N/ha for the proposed system and 65 kg N/ha for the current system. These results conclude that a fodder beet/standoff pad system provides a viable means of reducing nitrate leaching in a wintering system in Canterbury; however, the cost of this is significantly higher than a traditional paddock based system. A calculation estimated that the use of a structure to reduce leached nitrogen was $171 per kg of leached nitrogen mitigated.... [Show full abstract]
    Keywords
    nitrate leaching; fodder crops; wintering system; fodder beet; standoff pad; dairing farming; environment; nitrogen; cows; sustainable farming
    Fields of Research
    05 Environmental Sciences; 0701 Agriculture, Land and Farm Management; 0703 Crop and Pasture Production; 070108 Sustainable Agricultural Development
    Date
    2014
    Type
    Dissertation
    Collections
    • Department of Land Management and Systems [425]
    • Dissertations [475]
    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Brown_BAgrSc(Hons).pdf
    Share this

    on Twitter on Facebook on LinkedIn on Reddit on Tumblr by Email

    Metadata
     Expand record
    This service is maintained by Learning, Teaching and Library
    • Open Access Policy
    • Copyright and Reuse
    • Deposit Guidelines and FAQ
    • Contact Us
     

     

    Browse

    All of Research@LincolnCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsKeywordsBy Issue DateThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsKeywordsBy Issue Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics
    This service is maintained by Learning, Teaching and Library
    • Open Access Policy
    • Copyright and Reuse
    • Deposit Guidelines and FAQ
    • Contact Us