Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrown, N. M.
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-14T02:45:47Z
dc.date.available2015-01-14T02:45:47Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/6412
dc.description.abstractDairy farmers are under scrutiny for the negative effect their farming operations have on the environment, particularly in regard to nitrate leaching. The National Policy Statement for Freshwater has directed regional councils to set limits for nutrient losses by 2030. Of particular interest are the traditional fodder crop wintering systems which have a higher density of urine patches at times of greater drainage. Since plant demand is low, high levels of nitrate leaching result. Current proposed alternative strategies, such as shed housing can have a large initial cost, with impacts on the financial viability of the business. This project investigated the environmental and economic effects of a fodder beet/standoff pad wintering system as an alternative to the current Lincoln University Dairy Farm (LUDF) forage crop wintering system, where all crop/supplement are fed in paddock. These systems were modelled using partial budgets for the winter period and analysis in Overseer® version 6.1.3 to quantify the economic and environmental effects. In the models, 400 cows were either grazed 24 hours per day on the crop with silage, or an alternative system which restricted grazed fodder beet for six hours per day for the 61 day period, with silage fed on a pad that collects all effluent. In both case the cows were allocated 8 kg DM per cow of fodder beet. For the paddock option, they were allocated 6 kg DM of silage and on the pad 4.8 kg DM of silage (due to better utilisation). This analysis concluded that the proposed system cost $41.07 per cow per week, which was 82.3% more expensive than the historical system at $22.53 per cow per week. The proposed system’s levels of nitrogen lost to water were 56.9% lower than the historical system, with losses of 28 kg N/ha for the proposed system and 65 kg N/ha for the current system. These results conclude that a fodder beet/standoff pad system provides a viable means of reducing nitrate leaching in a wintering system in Canterbury; however, the cost of this is significantly higher than a traditional paddock based system. A calculation estimated that the use of a structure to reduce leached nitrogen was $171 per kg of leached nitrogen mitigated.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherLincoln Universityen
dc.subjectnitrate leachingen
dc.subjectfodder cropsen
dc.subjectwintering systemen
dc.subjectfodder beeten
dc.subjectstandoff paden
dc.subjectdairing farmingen
dc.subjectenvironmenten
dc.subjectnitrogenen
dc.subjectcowsen
dc.subjectsustainable farmingen
dc.titleAn investigation of the incorporation of a standoff facility with the grazing of fodder beet in a Canterbury dairy wintering systemen
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.nameBachelor of Agricultural Science (Honours)en
lu.thesis.supervisorPangborn, Marvin
lu.contributor.unitDepartment of Agricultural Management and Property Studiesen
dc.subject.anzsrc05 Environmental Sciencesen
dc.subject.anzsrc0701 Agriculture, Land and Farm Managementen
dc.subject.anzsrc0703 Crop and Pasture Productionen
dc.subject.anzsrc070108 Sustainable Agricultural Developmenten


Files in this item

Default Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record