Research@Lincoln
    • Login
     
    View Item 
    •   Research@Lincoln Home
    • Metadata-only (no full-text)
    • Metadata-only (no full-text)
    • View Item
    •   Research@Lincoln Home
    • Metadata-only (no full-text)
    • Metadata-only (no full-text)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Predicting nitrate discharge dynamics in mesoscale catchments using the lumped StreamGEM model and Bayesian parameter inference

    Woodward, Simon; Wohling, Thomas; Rode, M.; Stenger, Roland
    Abstract
    The common practice of infrequent (e.g., monthly) stream water quality sampling for state of the environment monitoring may, when combined with high resolution stream flow data, provide sufficient information to accurately characterise the dominant nutrient transfer pathways and predict annual catchment yields. In the proposed approach, we use the spatially lumped catchment model StreamGEM to predict daily stream flow and nitrate concentration (mg L−1 NO3-N) in four contrasting mesoscale headwater catchments based on four years of daily rainfall, potential evapotranspiration, and stream flow measurements, and monthly or daily nitrate concentrations. Posterior model parameter distributions were estimated using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling code DREAMZS and a log-likelihood function assuming heteroscedastic, t-distributed residuals. Despite high uncertainty in some model parameters, the flow and nitrate calibration data was well reproduced across all catchments (Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency against Log transformed data, NSL, in the range 0.62–0.83 for daily flow and 0.17–0.88 for nitrate concentration). The slight increase in the size of the residuals for a separate validation period was considered acceptable (NSL in the range 0.60–0.89 for daily flow and 0.10–0.74 for nitrate concentration, excluding one data set with limited validation data). Proportions of flow and nitrate discharge attributed to near-surface, fast seasonal groundwater and slow deeper groundwater were consistent with expectations based on catchment geology. The results for the Weida Stream in Thuringia, Germany, using monthly as opposed to daily nitrate data were, for all intents and purposes, identical, suggesting that four years of monthly nitrate sampling provides sufficient information for calibration of the StreamGEM model and prediction of catchment dynamics. This study highlights the remarkable effectiveness of process based, spatially lumped modelling with commonly available monthly stream sample data, to elucidate high resolution catchment function, when appropriate calibration methods are used that correctly handle the inherent uncertainties.... [Show full abstract]
    Keywords
    stream flow hydrograph; water quality; direct runoff; groundwater discharge; DREAM; uncertainty; Environmental Engineering
    Fields of Research
    040608 Surfacewater Hydrology; 090508 Water Quality Engineering
    Date
    2017-09
    Type
    Journal Article
    Collections
    • Metadata-only (no full-text) [4843]
    View/Open
    Share this

    on Twitter on Facebook on LinkedIn on Reddit on Tumblr by Email

    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.07.021
    Metadata
     Expand record
    © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
    Citation
    Woodward, S.J.R., Wöhling, T., Rode, M., & Stenger, R. (2017). Predicting nitrate discharge dynamics in mesoscale catchments using the lumped StreamGEM model and Bayesian parameter inference. Journal of Hydrology, 552, 684-703. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.07.021
    This service is maintained by Learning, Teaching and Library
    • Archive Policy
    • Copyright and Reuse
    • Deposit Guidelines and FAQ
    • Contact Us
     

     

    Browse

    All of Research@LincolnCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsKeywordsBy Issue DateThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsKeywordsBy Issue Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics
    This service is maintained by Learning, Teaching and Library
    • Archive Policy
    • Copyright and Reuse
    • Deposit Guidelines and FAQ
    • Contact Us