Kayad, ARodrigues, FANaranjo, SSozzi, MPirotti, FMarinello, FSchulthess, UDefourny, PGerard, BWeiss, M2022-07-292022-03-102022-06-012022-01-190378-42900I0FL (isidoc)35663617 (pubmed)https://hdl.handle.net/10182/15256Mapping crop within-field yield variability provide an essential piece of information for precision agriculture applications. Leaf Area Index (LAI) is an important parameter that describes maize growth, vegetation structure, light absorption and subsequently maize biomass and grain yield (GY). The main goal for this study was to estimate maize biomass and GY through LAI retrieved from hyperspectral aerial images using a PROSAIL model inversion and compare its performance with biomass and GY estimations through simple vegetation index approaches. This study was conducted in two separate maize fields of 12 and 20 ha located in north-west Mexico. Both fields were cultivated with the same hybrid. One field was irrigated by a linear pivot and the other by a furrow irrigation system. Ground LAI data were collected at different crop growth stages followed by maize biomass and GY at the harvesting time. Through a weekly/biweekly airborne flight campaign, a total of 19 mosaics were acquired between both fields with a micro-hyperspectral Vis-NIR imaging sensor ranging from 400 to 850 nanometres (nm) at different crop growth stages. The PROSAIL model was calibrated and validated for retrieving maize LAI by simulating maize canopy spectral reflectance based on crop-specific parameters. The model was used to retrieve LAI from both fields and to subsequently estimate maize biomass and GY. Additionally, different vegetation indices were calculated from the aerial images to also estimate maize yield and compare the indices with PROSAIL based estimations. The PROSAIL validation to retrieve LAI from hyperspectral imagery showed a R² value of 0.5 against ground LAI with RMSE of 0.8 m²/m². Maize biomass and GY estimation based on NDRE showed the highest accuracies, followed by retrieved LAI, GNDVI and NDVI with R² value of 0.81, 0.73, 0.73 and 0.65 for biomass, and 0.83, 0.69, 0.73 and 0.62 for GY estimation, respectively. Furthermore, the late vegetative growth stage at V16 was found to be the best stage for maize yield prediction for all studied indices.12 pagesPrinten© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.precision agriculturePROSAILvegetation indicesmaize within-field variabilitydigital farmingJournal Article10.1016/j.fcr.2022.1084491872-68522022-05-24ANZSRC::300206 Agricultural spatial analysis and modellingANZSRC::300202 Agricultural land managementANZSRC::300499 Crop and pasture production not elsewhere classifiedANZSRC::300405 Crop and pasture biomass and bioproductsANZSRC::3002 Agriculture, land and farm managementANZSRC::3004 Crop and pasture productionhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Attribution