Tara, ALawson, GillianDavies, WChenoweth, APratten, G2024-02-072024-01-312024-022024-01-25JG6I9 (isidoc)https://hdl.handle.net/10182/16858The Landscape Character Assessment (LCA) method from the UK has proven effective in identifying landscape values and characteristics through a comprehensive mapping process. However, it is predominantly expert-led and lacks an evaluation of scenery, hindering the inclusion of the broader community’s preferences and visual attachment to their landscape. In Australia, the application of the Scenic Amenity Methodology (SAM) using Geographical Information System (GIS) mapping has engaged communities but has often overlooked the importance of landscape character. To overcome these limitations, this study presents an innovative scenic assessment methodology, referred to as modified Scenic Amenity Methodology (modified SAM). The methodology establishes landscape character types (LCTs) to map scenic preference ratings derived from community photo surveys. Simultaneously, it incorporates the visual exposure of the landscape from publicly accessible viewpoints, modelled using a Digital Elevation Model (DEM). The combination of scenic preferences and visual exposure enables mapping of the scenic amenity values held by the community. This methodology was first trialled in Bundaberg, then Cairns, the Whitsunday Islands, and, most recently, Toowoomba in Queensland, Australia. This paper presents the results of the Toowoomba study and reports on the challenges and limitations of informing landscape character type (LCT) values through a public photo survey, developing a scenic preference map from ratings of photos across a region, a map of the visual exposure of landscape elements from key public viewing locations, and, ultimately, a map of scenic amenity values across the Toowoomba Region. It indicates that integrating previous LCA approaches with public participation through community preferences is indeed feasible for regional landscape planning.26 pagesen© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.landscape characterlandscape planningscenic amenityscenic preferencevisual exposureJournal Article10.3390/land130201692073-445XANZSRC::330107 Architecture managementANZSRC::330109 Landscape architectureANZSRC::410206 Landscape ecologyANZSRC::330404 Land use and environmental planningANZSRC::3301 ArchitectureANZSRC::3304 Urban and regional planningANZSRC::4104 Environmental managementhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Attribution