Briski, EKotronaki, SGCuthbert, RNBortolus, ACampbell, MLDick, JTAFofonoff, PGalil, BSHewitt, ChadLockwood, JLMacIsaac, HJRicciardi, ARuiz, GSchwindt, ESommer, UZhan, ACarlton, JT2024-10-022023-10-282024-012023-10-131466-822XEJ3O5 (isidoc)https://hdl.handle.net/10182/17681Aim: Human activities have introduced numerous non-native species (NNS) worldwide. Understanding and predicting large-scale NNS establishment patterns remain fundamental scientific challenges. Here, we evaluate if NNS composition represents a proportional subset of the total species pool available to invade (i.e. total global biodiversity), or, conversely, certain taxa are disproportionately pre-disposed to establish in non-native areas. Location: Global. Time period: Present day. Major taxa studied: Global diversity. Methods: We compiled one of the most comprehensive global databases of NNS (36,822 established species) to determine if NNS diversity is a representative proportional subset of global biodiversity. Results: Our study revealed that, while NNS diversity mirrors global biodiversity to a certain extent, due to significant deviance from the null model it is not always a representative proportional subset of global biodiversity. The strength of global biodiversity as a predictor depended on the taxonomic scale, with successive lower taxonomic levels less predictive than the one above it. Consequently, on average, 58%, 42% and 28% of variability in NNS numbers were explained by global biodiversity for phylum, class and family respectively. Moreover, global biodiversity was a similarly strong explanatory variable for NNS diversity among regions, but not habitats (i.e. terrestrial, freshwater and marine), where it better predicted NNS diversity for terrestrial than for freshwater and marine habitats. Freshwater and marine habitats were also greatly understudied relative to invasions in the terrestrial habitats. Over-represented NNS relative to global biodiversity tended to be those intentionally introduced and/or ‘hitchhikers’ associated with deliberate introductions. Finally, randomness is likely an important factor in the establishment success of NNS. Main conclusions: Besides global biodiversity, other important explanatory variables for large-scale patterns of NNS diversity likely include propagule and colonization pressures, environmental similarity between native and non-native regions, biased selection of intentionally introduced species and disparate research efforts of habitats and taxa.pp.48-62en© 2023 The Authors. Global Ecology and Biogeography published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.alien speciesclass taxonomic levelfamily taxonomic levelinvasive speciesnon-indigenous speciesphylum taxonomic levelDoes non-native diversity mirror Earth's biodiversity?Journal Article10.1111/geb.137811466-8238ANZSRC::310307 Population ecologyANZSRC::410401 Conservation and biodiversityANZSRC::410202 Biosecurity science and invasive species ecologyANZSRC::310304 Freshwater ecologyANZSRC::310305 Marine and estuarine ecology (incl. marine ichthyology)ANZSRC::410402 Environmental assessment and monitoringANZSRC::3103 EcologyANZSRC::4102 Ecological applicationsANZSRC::4104 Environmental managementhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Attribution-NonCommercial