Identifying ‘win-win-win’ futures from inequitable value chain trade-offs: A system dynamics approach

dc.contributor.authorCooper, GS
dc.contributor.authorRich, KM
dc.contributor.authorShankar, B
dc.contributor.authorRana, V
dc.contributor.authorRatna, Nazmun
dc.contributor.authorKadiyala, S
dc.contributor.authorAlam, MJ
dc.contributor.authorNadagouda, SB
dc.coverage.spatialEngland
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-28T21:21:08Z
dc.date.available2021-02-12
dc.date.issued2021-05
dc.date.submitted2021-02-01
dc.description.abstractContext: There is growing recognition that food systems must adapt to become more sustainable and equitable. Consequently, in developing country contexts, there is increasing momentum away from traditional producer-facing value chain upgrades towards efforts to increase both the availability and affordability of nutritious foods at the consumer level. However, such goals must navigate the inherent complexities of agricultural value chains, which involve multiple interactions, feedbacks and unintended consequences, including important but often surprising trade-offs between producers and consumers. Objective and methods: Based around the ’Loop’ horticultural aggregation scheme of Digital Green in Bihar, India, we develop a system dynamics modelling framework to survey the value chain trade-offs emerging from upgrades that aim to improve the availability of fruits and vegetables in small retail-oriented markets. We model the processes of horticultural production, aggregation, marketing, and retailing – searching for futures that are ‘win-win-win’ for: (i) the availability of fruits and vegetables in small retail markets, (ii) the profits of farmers participating in aggregation, and (iii) the sustainability of the initial scheme for Digital Green as an organisation. We simulate two internal upgrades to aggregation and two upgrades to the wider enabling environment through a series of 5000 Monte Carlo trajectories – designed to explore the plausible future dynamics of the three outcome dimensions relative to the baseline. Results: We find that ‘win-win-win’ futures cannot be achieved by internal changes to the aggregation scheme alone, emerging under a narrow range of scenarios that boost supplies to the small retail market whilst simultaneously supporting the financial takeaways of farmers. In contrast, undesirable producer versus consumer trade-offs emerge as unintended consequences of scaling-up aggregation and the introduction of market-based cold storage. Significance: This approach furthers ongoing efforts to capture complex value chain processes, outcomes and upgrades within system dynamics modelling frameworks, before scanning the horizon of plausible external scenarios, internal dynamics and unintended trade-offs to identify ‘win-win-win’ futures for all.
dc.format.extent15 pages
dc.format.mediumPrint
dc.identifierS0308-521X(21)00049-4
dc.identifierhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=elements_prod&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000647657600001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103096
dc.identifier.eissn1873-2267
dc.identifier.issn0308-521X
dc.identifier.otherRY1DS (isidoc)
dc.identifier.other34025008 (pubmed)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/13481
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relationThe original publication is available from Elsevier - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103096 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103096
dc.relation.isPartOfAgricultural Systems
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103096
dc.rights© 2021 The Author(s).
dc.rights.ccnameAttribution
dc.rights.ccurihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectsystem dynamics model
dc.subjectagricultural marketing
dc.subjectfruits and vegetables
dc.subjectplausible futures
dc.subjectIndia
dc.subject.anzsrcANZSRC::070108 Sustainable Agricultural Development
dc.subject.anzsrcANZSRC::070699 Horticultural Production not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.anzsrcANZSRC::1505 Marketing
dc.subject.anzsrc2020ANZSRC::30 Agricultural, veterinary and food sciences
dc.subject.anzsrc2020ANZSRC::41 Environmental sciences
dc.titleIdentifying ‘win-win-win’ futures from inequitable value chain trade-offs: A system dynamics approach
dc.typeJournal Article
lu.contributor.unitLU
lu.contributor.unitLU|Faculty of Agribusiness and Commerce
lu.contributor.unitLU|Faculty of Agribusiness and Commerce|GVCT
lu.contributor.unitLU|Research Management Office
lu.contributor.unitLU|Research Management Office|OLD QE18
lu.contributor.unitLU|Research Management Office|OLD PE20
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7565-2834
pubs.article-number103096
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103096
pubs.volume190
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Ratna - Identifying ‘win-win-win’ futures 2021.pdf
Size:
3.95 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published PDF version
Licence bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Deposit licence agreement - R@L.pdf
Size:
396.23 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: