Comparison of three plant growth regulators and urea on a Canterbury dairy pasture

dc.contributor.authorJiang, Shuang
dc.contributor.authorCarey, Peter
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, A.
dc.contributor.authorKerse, G.
dc.contributor.editorCurrie, L. D.en
dc.contributor.editorChristensen, C. L.en
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-10T02:12:07Z
dc.date.issued2011-02
dc.description.abstractTwo plant growth regulator (PGR) products currently available in New Zealand and a new Ravensdown PGR product-ExpressTM*, all based on gibberellic acid (GA3), were applied to a Canterbury dairy pasture in late winter (August) and early spring (September) and their effect on dry-matter (DM) yield was measured. PGR treatments were compared with both an application of liquid urea (20 kg N/ha) alone and a urea plus Express treatment. In the first harvest of both winter- and spring-initiated trials, a month following PGR application, the PGR treatments produced significant increases in DM yield ranging from 18-51% over the control. These increases, however, did not extend to the second harvest in either trial for any of the PGR agents. The application of urea increased production in the 1st harvest by ~36% in both trials but this was increased to over 60% when combined with ExpressTM. No effect of the PGR was apparent in the second harvest where the urea treatment alone was the highest DM producer. These trials showed some benefit in the use of PGR products when there is a need to boost pasture growth in early spring but these benefits largely disappeared after the first month following application.Some future research may be useful to further optimise parameters for the use of PGR products.en
dc.format.extent5en
dc.identifier.citationJiang, S., Carey, P.L., Roberts, A., & Kerse, G.( 2011). Comparison of three plant growth regulators and urea on a Canterbury dairy pasture. In L.D. Currie and C L. Christensen (Eds.), Adding to the knowledge base for the nutrient manager: Occasional Report No. 24. Fertilizer and Lime Research Centre, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://flrc.massey.ac.nz/workshops/11/Manuscripts/Jiang_2011.pdf
dc.identifier.eissn2230-3944en
dc.identifier.issn0112-9902en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/11564
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFertilizer and Lime Research Centre
dc.publisher.placeMassey Universityen
dc.relationThe original publication is available from - Fertilizer and Lime Research Centre - http://flrc.massey.ac.nz/workshops/11/paperlist11.htmen
dc.relation.isPartOfAdding to the knowledge base for the nutrient manageren
dc.rights© The Authors & FLRC.
dc.source24th Annual FLRC Workshop: Adding to the Knowledge Base for the Nutrient Manageren
dc.subjectgibberellic aciden
dc.subjectplant growth regulatorsen
dc.subjectUreaen
dc.subjectpastureen
dc.subject.anzsrcANZSRC::0703 Crop and Pasture Productionen
dc.subject.anzsrcANZSRC::079902 Fertilisers and Agrochemicals (incl. Application)en
dc.titleComparison of three plant growth regulators and urea on a Canterbury dairy pastureen
dc.typeConference Contribution - published
lu.contributor.unitLincoln University
lu.contributor.unitFaculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences
lu.contributor.unitDepartment of Agricultural Sciences
lu.contributor.unitLincoln Agritech
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0163-2064
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2301-2528
lu.subtypeConference Paperen
pubs.finish-date2011-02-10en
pubs.notesOccasional Report No. 24en
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://flrc.massey.ac.nz/workshops/11/paperlist11.htmen
pubs.start-date2011-02-08en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Jiang_2011_Comparison+of+three+plant+growth+regulators+and+urea+on+a+canterbury+dairy+pasture.pdf
Size:
114.44 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published PDF version
Licence bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Deposit Licence (LURA).pdf
Size:
11.35 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections