Wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase Doppler interferometer

dc.contributor.authorRoten, R
dc.contributor.authorPost, S
dc.contributor.authorWerner, A
dc.contributor.authorSafa, Majeed
dc.contributor.authorHewitt, A
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-25T02:38:00Z
dc.date.available2017-11-08
dc.date.issued2017-09
dc.description.abstractIt is essential to know the movement of droplets in time and space (i.e. flux) when measuring and/or predicting spray drift in agricultural application. A study was performed to assess the flux measurements of a phase Doppler system against a standard monofilament system in a wind tunnel. The primary objectives of the study were to compare flux from a new phase Doppler system against 1.7 mm cotton and 2.0 mm nylon strings at varying wind speeds (1.4, 4.2, 8.3, 12.5, and 16.7 m ⋅ s⁻¹) and spray exposures times (5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 s) with an overarching hypothesis that the active, phase Doppler is able to accurately measure the flux regardless of exposure and spray mass whereas the static string samplers are limited to a maximum retention. The phase Doppler did measure linearly as expected, however strings did not reach a point in which they loss mass; conversely, they appeared to overload with saturation. These findings are believed to be among many variables which influence the variability of previous mass balance studies.
dc.format.extentpp.281-287
dc.identifier.citationRoten, R.L., Post, S.L., Werner, A., Safa, M., & Hewitt, A.J. (2017). Wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase Doppler interferometer, Journal of Plant Protection Research, 57(3), 281-287. doi:10.1515/jppr-2017-0040
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/jppr-2017-0040
dc.identifier.eissn1899-007X
dc.identifier.issn1427-4345
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/8940
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDe Gruyter Open on behalf of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant Protection - National Research Institute and the Polish Society of Plant Protection, Committee of Plant Protection
dc.relationThe original publication is available from De Gruyter Open on behalf of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant Protection - National Research Institute and the Polish Society of Plant Protection, Committee of Plant Protection - https://doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2017-0040 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2017-0040
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Plant Protection Research
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2017-0040
dc.rights© The Authors
dc.rights.ccnameAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives
dc.rights.ccurihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectphase Doppler system
dc.subjectwind tunnel
dc.subjectflux monofilament system
dc.subject.anzsrcANZSRC::0701 Agriculture, Land and Farm Management
dc.subject.anzsrcANZSRC::079902 Fertilisers and Agrochemicals (incl. Application)
dc.subject.anzsrcANZSRC::070308 Crop and Pasture Protection (Pests, Diseases and Weeds)
dc.titleWind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase Doppler interferometer
dc.typeJournal Article
lu.contributor.unitLincoln University
lu.contributor.unitFaculty of Agribusiness and Commerce
lu.contributor.unitDepartment of Land Management and Systems
lu.contributor.unitLincoln Agritech
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8670-6156
pubs.issue3
pubs.notesEmbargoed until 02 Sep 2018 Date of acceptance: 12 Sep 2017
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2017-0040
pubs.volume57
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
roten Wind tunnel flux comparisons using a phase Doppler interferometer 2017.pdf
Size:
841.51 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published PDF version
Licence bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Deposit Licence (LURA).pdf
Size:
11.35 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: