Characterising variation in the gene for the Dichelobacter nodosus Type IV fimbrial protein: Development of a molecular typing system
Authors
Date
1997
Type
Dissertation
Abstract
Dichelobacter nodosus is the causative agent of ovine footrot. The Type IV multi-subunit
fimbriae of D.nodosus represents the key immunogenic component of footrot vaccines
(Stewart 1989). Variation within the gene (jimA) for the fimbrial protein suQ.unit is currently
the basis for the serotype classification of these bacteria. To date, no sequencing of the fimA
gene has been conducted for New Zealand isolates.
This study describes the development of a PCR specific for the variable region of the fimA
gene. Cloning and sequencing of a single field derived amplimer and eight cultures currently
being used in commercial footrot vaccines (Mallinckrodt Veterinary Ltd), is described. The
rimA sequences exhibited varying degrees (89-100%) of homology to the prototype
Australian strains (Mattick et ai., 1991). Serotype B sequences of New Zealand origin
showed the greatest variation at the protein level. Two of these sequences predicted 11 and
13 amino acid substitutions (compared to the prototype B 1 isolate) in the hypervariable
region of the protein between cysteine residues, that is thought to comprise the B-cell epitope.
Such sequence variation may account for the ineffectiveness of vaccines which currently
employ a majority of isolates of Australian origin. These findings indicate that further
characterisation of Jim A gene heterogeneity is required within New Zealand to allow
optimisation of footrot vaccines.
AfimA based PCR-RFLP typing system was described and potentially represents a quick and
cost effective means of typing D.nodosus from lesion material. The development of
molecular techniques to rapidly "type" D.nodosus may enable strain-specific vaccines to be
formulated, thereby circumventing the problems associated with antigenic competition in
polyvalent formulations.
Permalink
Source DOI
Rights
https://researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz/pages/rights
Creative Commons Rights
Access Rights
Digital thesis can be viewed by current staff and students of Lincoln University only. If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.