Constant carbon dosing of a pilot-scale denitrifying bioreactor to improve nitrate removal from agricultural tile drainage

dc.contributor.authorMoghaddam, R
dc.contributor.authorBarkle, G
dc.contributor.authorRivas, A
dc.contributor.authorTorres-Rojas, D
dc.contributor.authorSchipper, L
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-20T00:51:36Z
dc.date.available2022-11-21
dc.date.issued2023-02
dc.date.submitted2022-11-13
dc.date.updated2023-04-19T23:30:10Z
dc.description.abstractDenitrifying bioreactors are effective tools for removing nitrate from agricultural drainage water. However, as woodchips age with time, a shortage of labile carbon supply limits nitrate removal by microbial denitrification when high nitrate pulses occur in drainage waters. In this study, we investigated the potential of methanol dosing at a constant rate to increase nitrate removal rates in a 58 m³ pilot-scale bioreactor (25 m³ saturated volume) installed on a dairy farm for two consecutive drainage seasons. The drainage water in the bioreactor had a mean hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 12.7 days and 13.5 days in the 2020 and 2021 drainage seasons. With 14.4 L of methanol solution (8% v/v) added per day, the seasonal nitrate removal rates were 8.6 g N m¯³ d¯¹ in 2020 and 5.1 g N m¯³ d¯¹ in 2021 when the methanol dosing rate was halved. Both rates (2020 and 2021) were enhanced as compared to seasonal rates of 0.67–1.60 g N m¯³ d¯¹ in previous years (2017 and 2018) when the bioreactor was not dosed. When there were very large pulses of nitrate into the bioreactor, which exhausted added methanol, nitrate was observed at concentrations above limiting ranges (> 3 mg N L¯¹) at the outlet on several occasions in 2021. Cumulative nitrate load reductions of 1859 g N and 1620 g N occurred in 2020 and 2021, respectively, resulting in overall nitrate removal efficiencies of 85 and 73%, respectively. Methanol concentrations decreased by order of magnitude along the bioreactor length, from mean inlet concentrations of 327 mg CH₃OH-C L¯¹ in 2020 (higher dosing rate) to concentrations of <50 mg CH₃OH-C L¯¹ at the outlet. The mean methanol removal rates of 106 g CH₃OH-Cm¯³ d¯¹ in 2020 and 109 g CH₃OH-C m¯³ d¯¹ 1 in 2021. A 90% (2020) and 100% (2021) overall methanol removal efficiency was calculated. With methanol dosing, sulfate removal occurred in the bioreactor, with an average sulfate removal rate of 8.5 g SO₄²¯-S m¯³ d¯¹ in 2020 and 0.5 g SO₄²¯-S m¯³ d¯¹ in 2021. This work demonstrated that methanol additions to bioreactors could enhance denitrification rates even when nitrate was limiting without considerable losses of methanol being released to the receiving waters.
dc.format.extent12 pages
dc.identifierhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=elements_prod&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000895775500005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106851
dc.identifier.eissn1872-6992
dc.identifier.issn0925-8574
dc.identifier.other6W5NN (isidoc)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/16052
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relationThe original publication is available from Elsevier - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106851 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106851
dc.relation.isPartOfEcological Engineering
dc.relation.ispartofEcological Engineering
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106851
dc.rights© 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectcarbon dosing
dc.subjectdrainage waters
dc.subjectenhanced nitrate removal
dc.subjectwoodchip bioreactors
dc.subject.anzsrc2020ANZSRC::37 Earth sciences
dc.subject.anzsrc2020ANZSRC::40 Engineering
dc.subject.anzsrc2020ANZSRC::41 Environmental sciences
dc.titleConstant carbon dosing of a pilot-scale denitrifying bioreactor to improve nitrate removal from agricultural tile drainage
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
lu.contributor.unitLincoln University
lu.contributor.unitLincoln Agritech
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2772-2711
pubs.article-number106851
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.publisher-urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106851
pubs.volume187
Files