Fungal and bacterial contributions to codenitrification emissions of N₂O and N₂ following urea deposition to soil

dc.contributor.authorRex, D
dc.contributor.authorClough, Timothy
dc.contributor.authorRichards, KG
dc.contributor.authorde Klein, CAM
dc.contributor.authorMorales, SE
dc.contributor.authorSamad, MS
dc.contributor.authorGrant, J
dc.contributor.authorLanigan, GJ
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-13T00:42:05Z
dc.date.available2017-12-29
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.date.submitted2017-12-21
dc.description.abstractGrazed pastures contribute significantly to anthropogenic emissions of N₂O but the respective contributions of archaea, bacteria and fungi to codenitrification in such systems is unresolved. This study examined the relative contributions of bacteria and fungi to rates of denitrification and codenitrification under a simulated ruminant urine event. It was hypothesised that fungi would be primarily responsible for both codenitrification and total N₂O and N₂ emissions. The effects of bacterial (streptomycin), fungal (cycloheximide), and combined inhibitor treatments were measured in a laboratory mesocosm experiment, on soil that had received ¹⁵N labelled urea. Soil inorganic-N concentrations, N₂O and N₂ gas fluxes were measured over 51 days. On Days 42 and 51, when nitrification was actively proceeding in the positive control, the inhibitor treatments inhibited nitrification as evidenced by increased soil NH₄ + -N concentrations and decreased soil NO₂ ⁻ -N and NO 3 ⁻ -N concentrations. Codenitrification was observed to contribute to total fluxes of both N₂O (≥ 33%) and N 2 (≥ 3%) in urine-amended grassland soils. Cycloheximide inhibition decreased NH₄ ⁺ –¹⁵N enrichment and reduced N₂O fluxes while reducing the contribution of codenitrification to total N₂O fluxes by ≥ 66 and ≥ 42%, respectively. Thus, given archaea do not respond to significant urea deposition, it is proposed that fungi, not bacteria, dominated total N₂O fluxes, and the codenitrification N₂O fluxes, from a simulated urine amended pasture soil.
dc.format.extentpp.135-149
dc.format.mediumUndetermined
dc.identifierhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=elements_prod&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000419907000011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10705-017-9901-7
dc.identifier.eissn1573-0867
dc.identifier.issn1385-1314
dc.identifier.otherFS6KT (isidoc)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/10349
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relationThe original publication is available from Springer - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-017-9901-7 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-017-9901-7
dc.relation.isPartOfNutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
dc.relation.ispartofNutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-017-9901-7
dc.rights© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017
dc.subjectcodenitrication
dc.subjectnitrous oxide
dc.subjectruminant urine
dc.subjectmicrobial inhibition
dc.subjectgrassland
dc.subject¹⁵N
dc.subject.anzsrcANZSRC::070302 Agronomy
dc.subject.anzsrc2020ANZSRC::3004 Crop and pasture production
dc.subject.anzsrc2020ANZSRC::4004 Chemical engineering
dc.subject.anzsrc2020ANZSRC::4106 Soil sciences
dc.titleFungal and bacterial contributions to codenitrification emissions of N₂O and N₂ following urea deposition to soil
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
lu.contributor.unitLincoln University
lu.contributor.unitFaculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences
lu.contributor.unitDepartment of Soil and Physical Sciences
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5978-5274
pubs.issue1
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.publisher-urlhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-017-9901-7
pubs.volume110
Files