Identifying transportation disadvantage: Mixed-methods analysis combining GIS mapping with qualitative field data

dc.contributor.authorShay, E
dc.contributor.authorCombs, T
dc.contributor.authorFindley, D
dc.contributor.authorKolosna, C
dc.contributor.authorMadeley, M
dc.contributor.authorSalvesen, D
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-18T20:52:13Z
dc.date.available2016-03-14
dc.date.issued2016-05
dc.date.submitted2016-03-08
dc.description.abstractRural residents, including elderly, low-income or people with language or physical mobility challenges, may experience transportation disadvantage when land use patterns, built environment and transportation services fail to meet their mobility needs. A technique for identifying transportation-disadvantaged populations, intended for use by local practitioners and designed with their skills and professional routines in mind, was piloted in five rural counties in North Carolina. Maps showing areas of elevated theoretical risk of transportation disadvantage were constructed by overlaying layers of readily available, Census-based geospatial data, to generate composite maps where increasing intensity of shading denotes populations with multiple risk factors. The maps were used in key informant interviews with local transportation-relevant professionals to access their expert knowledge, and in focus groups with non-expert residents to probe their travel routines and need to access essential goods, services and activities. These multiple data sources supported an iterative process of initial mapping, stakeholder outreach, revised mapping, and continued discussion. Our findings both corroborated some a priori expectations, and yielded unexpected insights into which residents may experience transportation disadvantage and how they respond. The work demonstrates how local knowledge can be used to identify unique or non-spatial components of transportation disadvantage, and underscores the importance of locally specific knowledge to support planning efforts to identify and ultimately to address transportation disadvantage.
dc.format.extentpp.129-138
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.03.002
dc.identifier.issn0967-070X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/11435
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relationThe original publication is available from Elsevier - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.03.002 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.03.002
dc.relation.isPartOfTransport Policy
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.03.002
dc.rights© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.subjecttransportation disadvantage
dc.subjectqualitative research methods
dc.subjectkey informant interviews
dc.subjectfocus groups
dc.subjectrural transportation
dc.titleIdentifying transportation disadvantage: Mixed-methods analysis combining GIS mapping with qualitative field data
dc.typeJournal Article
lu.contributor.unitLincoln University
lu.contributor.unitFaculty of Environment, Society and Design
lu.contributor.unitDepartment of Environmental Management
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0362-7015
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.03.002
pubs.volume48
Files