Security of supply, energy spillage control and peaking options within a 100% renewable electricity system for New Zealand

dc.contributor.authorMason, IG
dc.contributor.authorPage, Shannon
dc.contributor.authorWilliamson, AG
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-12T03:18:07Z
dc.date.available2013-06-19
dc.date.issued2013-09
dc.date.submitted2013-05-10
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, issues of security of supply, energy spillage control, and peaking options, within a fully renewable electricity system, are addressed. We show that a generation mix comprising 49% hydro, 23% wind, 13% geothermal, 14% pumped hydro energy storage peaking plant, and 1% biomass-fuelled generation on an installed capacity basis, was capable of ensuring security of supply over an historic 6-year period, which included the driest hydrological year on record in New Zealand since 1931. Hydro spillage was minimised, or eliminated, by curtailing a proportion of geothermal generation. Wind spillage was substantially reduced by utilising surplus generation for peaking purposes, resulting in up to 99.8% utilisation of wind energy. Peaking requirements were satisfied using 1550 MW of pumped hydro energy storage generation, with a capacity factor of 0.76% and an upper reservoir storage equivalent to 8% of existing hydro storage capacity. It is proposed that alternative peaking options, including biomass-fuelled gas turbines and demand-side measures, should be considered. As a transitional policy, the use of fossil-gas–fuelled gas turbines for peaking would result in a 99.8% renewable system on an energy basis. Further research into whether a market-based system is capable of delivering such a renewable electricity system is suggested.
dc.format.extentpp.324-333
dc.identifierhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=elements_prod&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000323530900033&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
dc.identifier.citationMason, I.G., Page, S.C., & Williamson, A.G. (2013). Security of supply, energy spillage control and peaking options within a 100% renewable electricity system for New Zealand. Energy Policy, 60, 324-333. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.032
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.032
dc.identifier.eissn1873-6777
dc.identifier.issn0301-4215
dc.identifier.other206OB (isidoc)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/8158
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relationThe original publication is available from Elsevier - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.032 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.032
dc.relation.isPartOfEnergy Policy
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.032
dc.rights© 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectrenewable
dc.subjectelectricity
dc.subjectgeneration
dc.subject.anzsrcANZSRC::090608 Renewable Power and Energy Systems Engineering (excl. Solar Cells)
dc.subject.anzsrcANZSRC::091305 Energy Generation, Conversion and Storage Engineering
dc.subject.anzsrcANZSRC::040608 Surfacewater Hydrology
dc.subject.anzsrc2020ANZSRC::3304 Urban and regional planning
dc.subject.anzsrc2020ANZSRC::4407 Policy and administration
dc.subject.anzsrc2020ANZSRC::4802 Environmental and resources law
dc.titleSecurity of supply, energy spillage control and peaking options within a 100% renewable electricity system for New Zealand
dc.typeJournal Article
lu.contributor.unitLU
lu.contributor.unitLU|Faculty of Environment, Society and Design
lu.contributor.unitLU|Faculty of Environment, Society and Design|DEM
lu.contributor.unitLU|Research Management Office
lu.contributor.unitLU|Research Management Office|OLD QE18
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8397-5908
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.032
pubs.volume60
Files