No-tillage did not increase organic carbon storage but stimulated N₂O emissions in an intensively cultivated sandy loam soil: A negative climate effect

dc.contributor.authorNiu, Yuhui,
dc.contributor.authorCai, Yanjiang,
dc.contributor.authorChen, Zengming,
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Jiafa,
dc.contributor.authorDi, Hong
dc.contributor.authorYu, Hongyan,
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Anning,
dc.contributor.authorDing, Weixin,
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T22:56:58Z
dc.date.available2019-09-17
dc.date.issued2019-12-01
dc.date.submitted2019-09-08
dc.description.abstractAlthough numerous studies have been conducted on the effects of no-tillage on carbon (C) sequestration in agricultural systems, there is still no consensus on the balance between the potential of C sequestration and nitrous oxide (N₂O) or nitric oxide (NO) emissions. A no-tillage field experiment in the North China Plain was established in 2006 and the influence of no-tillage on N₂O and NO emissions was monitored under an annual wheat-maize cropping system. The study included four treatments: no-tillage (NT) and conventional tillage (CT) soils amended with N fertilizer at a rate of 225 kg N ha ⁻¹for wheat and 195 kg N ha⁻¹ for maize (NTN and CTN) and without N fertilizer (NT0 and CT0). Three years of no-tillage significantly (p < 0.05) increased soil organic C (SOC) content by 12.2% in the 0–5 cm soil layer, possibly due to the surface aggregation of organic C derived from crop roots and exudates, but did not alter SOC pool in the 0–30 cm profile. Annual N₂O emissions in the NT0 and CT0 treatments were 0.53 and 0.57 kg N₂O-N ha⁻¹, respectively, and were significantly (p < 0.05) increased to 0.96 kg N₂O-N ha⁻¹ in CTN and to 1.23 kg N₂O-N ha⁻¹ in NTN. Remarkable differences in N₂O emissions between CTN and NTN were observed during the maize growing season. In contrast, NO emissions were not affected by the tillage regimes regardless of N fertilization. The mean ratios of NO/N₂O fluxes in N-unfertilized plots were 0.26–0.29 and 1.79–2.11 for the maize and wheat season, respectively, indicating that both NO and N₂O were primarily derived from denitrification during the maize growing season and from nitrification under wheat cultivation. Under N-fertilized plots, the ratios increased to 1.44–2.02 and 5.00–6.03 for the maize and wheat season, respectively, with significantly (p < 0.05) lower values in NTN plots than in CTN plots. The N₂O emission factors for N applied in the wheat-maize rotation system were 0.16% and 0.09% for NTN and CTN, respectively, which was far lower than the IPCC Tier 1 default value (1.0%), primarily due to the absence of irrigation after fertilization in maize season and low temperature in wheat season. The results suggest that the 3-year no-tillage regime with residue removal did not substantially increase C storage in the 0–30 cm profile, but stimulated N₂O emissions primarily by increasing denitrification.
dc.format.extent11 pages
dc.identifierhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=elements_prod&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000494053700043&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.still.2019.104419
dc.identifier.eissn1879-3444
dc.identifier.issn0167-1987
dc.identifier.otherJJ3IA (isidoc)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/11802
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relationThe original publication is available from Elsevier - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104419 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104419
dc.relation.isPartOfSoil and Tillage Research
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104419
dc.rights© 2019 Elsevier B.V.
dc.subjectdenitrification
dc.subjectnitric oxide
dc.subjectnitrous oxide
dc.subjectno-tillage
dc.subjectSOC
dc.subjectsurface aggregation
dc.subject.anzsrc2020ANZSRC::30 Agricultural, veterinary and food sciences
dc.subject.anzsrc2020ANZSRC::31 Biological sciences
dc.subject.anzsrc2020ANZSRC::41 Environmental sciences
dc.titleNo-tillage did not increase organic carbon storage but stimulated N₂O emissions in an intensively cultivated sandy loam soil: A negative climate effect
dc.typeJournal Article
lu.contributor.unitLU
lu.contributor.unitLU|Agriculture and Life Sciences
lu.contributor.unitLU|Agriculture and Life Sciences|SOILS
lu.contributor.unitLU|Research Management Office
lu.contributor.unitLU|Research Management Office|OLD QE18
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6966-0299
pubs.notesID 104419
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104419
pubs.volume195
Files