High intensity interval training in a real world setting: A randomized controlled feasibility study in overweight inactive adults, measuring change in maximal oxygen uptake

dc.contributor.authorLunt, H
dc.contributor.authorDraper, N
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, HC
dc.contributor.authorLogan, FJ
dc.contributor.authorHamlin, Michael
dc.contributor.authorShearman, JP
dc.contributor.authorCotter, JD
dc.contributor.authorKimber, NE
dc.contributor.authorBlackwell, G
dc.contributor.authorFrampton, CMA
dc.contributor.editorSchooling, CM
dc.coverage.spatialUnited States
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-30T03:41:49Z
dc.date.available2014-01-13
dc.date.issued2014-01
dc.date.submitted2013-10-30
dc.description.abstractBackground In research clinic settings, overweight adults undertaking HIIT (high intensity interval training) improve their fitness as effectively as those undertaking conventional walking programs but can do so within a shorter time spent exercising. We undertook a randomized controlled feasibility (pilot) study aimed at extending HIIT into a real world setting by recruiting overweight/obese, inactive adults into a group based activity program, held in a community park. Methods Participants were allocated into one of three groups. The two interventions, aerobic interval training and maximal volitional interval training, were compared with an active control group undertaking walking based exercise. Supervised group sessions (36 per intervention) were held outdoors. Cardiorespiratory fitness was measured using VO2max (maximal oxygen uptake, results expressed in ml/min/kg), before and after the 12 week interventions. Results On ITT (intention to treat) analyses, baseline (N = 49) and exit (N = 39) O2 was 25.3±4.5 and 25.3±3.9, respectively. Participant allocation and baseline/exit VO2max by group was as follows: Aerobic interval training N =  16, 24.2±4.8/25.6±4.8; maximal volitional interval training N = 16, 25.0±2.8/25.2±3.4; walking N = 17, 26.5±5.3/25.2±3.6. The post intervention change in VO2max was +1.01 in the aerobic interval training, −0.06 in the maximal volitional interval training and −1.03 in the walking subgroups. The aerobic interval training subgroup increased VO2max compared to walking (p = 0.03). The actual (observed, rather than prescribed) time spent exercising (minutes per week, ITT analysis) was 74 for aerobic interval training, 45 for maximal volitional interval training and 116 for walking (p =  0.001). On descriptive analysis, the walking subgroup had the fewest adverse events. Conclusions In contrast to earlier studies, the improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness in a cohort of overweight/obese participants undertaking aerobic interval training in a real world setting was modest. The most likely reason for this finding relates to reduced adherence to the exercise program, when moving beyond the research clinic setting.
dc.format.extentpp.1-11
dc.format.mediumElectronic-eCollection
dc.identifierPONE-D-13-12272
dc.identifierhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=elements_prod&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000329922500006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
dc.identifier.citationLunt H, Draper N, Marshall HC, Logan FJ, Hamlin MJ, et al. (2014). High Intensity Interval Training in a Real World Setting: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Study in Overweight Inactive Adults, Measuring Change in Maximal Oxygen Uptake. PLoS ONE 9(1): e83256. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083256
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0083256
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.other24454698 (pubmed)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/6630
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPLOS
dc.relationThe original publication is available from PLOS - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083256 - http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0083256
dc.relation.isPartOfPloS ONE
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083256
dc.rightsCopyright © 2014 Lunt et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.rights.ccnameAttribution
dc.rights.ccurihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjecthigh intensity interval training
dc.subjectaerobic intensity training
dc.subjectcardiorespiratory fitness
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.subject.meshExercise Therapy
dc.subject.meshCohort Studies
dc.subject.meshFeasibility Studies
dc.subject.meshOxygen Consumption
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshOverweight
dc.subject.meshSedentary Behavior
dc.titleHigh intensity interval training in a real world setting: A randomized controlled feasibility study in overweight inactive adults, measuring change in maximal oxygen uptake
dc.typeJournal Article
lu.contributor.unitLU
lu.contributor.unitLU|Faculty of Environment, Society and Design
lu.contributor.unitLU|Research Management Office
lu.contributor.unitLU|Research Management Office|OLD QE18
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7941-8554
pubs.issue1
pubs.notese83256
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0083256
pubs.volume9
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
High intensity interval training in a real world setting: a randomized controlled feasibility study in overweight inactive adults, measuring change in maximal oxygen uptake..pdf
Size:
486.94 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Licence bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Deposit Licence (LURA).pdf
Size:
11.02 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: