Taxonomic affinity, habitat and seed mass strongly predict seed desiccation response: A boosted regression trees analysis based on 17 539 species

dc.contributor.authorWyse, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorDickie, JB
dc.coverage.spatialEngland
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-21T22:20:23Z
dc.date.available2017-12-18
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.date.submitted2017-09-27
dc.description.abstractBackground and Aims: Seed desiccation response plays an important role in plant regeneration ecology, and has significant implications for species conservation. The majority of seed plants produce desiccation-tolerant (orthodox) seeds, whilst comparatively few produce desiccation-sensitive (recalcitrant) seeds that are unable to survive dehydration, and which cannot be conserved in traditional seed banks. This study develops a set of models to predict seed desiccation response in unstudied species. Methods: Taxonomy, trait, location and climate data were compiled to form a global data set of 17 539 species. Three boosted regression trees models were then developed to predict species' seed desiccation responses based on habitat and trait information for the species, and the seed desiccation responses of close relatives (either members of the same genus, family or order, depending on the model). Ten-fold cross-validation was used to test model predictive success. The utility of the models was then demonstrated by predicting seed desiccation response for two floras: Ecuador, and Britain and Ireland. Key Results: The three models had varying success rates for identifying the desiccation-sensitive species: 89 % for the genus-level model, 79 % for the family-level model and 60 % for the order-level model. The most important predictor variables were the seed desiccation responses of a species' relatives, seed mass and annual precipitation. It is predicted that 10 % of seed plants from Ecuador and 1.2 % of those from Britain and Ireland produce desiccation-sensitive seeds. Due to data availability, prediction accuracy is likely to be higher for the British and Irish flora, where it is estimated that a desiccation-sensitive species had a 96.7 % chance of being correctly identified, compared with 80.8 % in the Ecuador flora. Conclusions: These models can utilize existing data to predict species' likely seed desiccation responses, providing a gap-filling tool for global studies of plant traits, as well as critical decision-making support for plant conservation activities.
dc.format.extentpp.71-83
dc.format.mediumPrint
dc.identifier4756081
dc.identifierhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=elements_prod&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000423708500012&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/aob/mcx128
dc.identifier.eissn1095-8290
dc.identifier.issn0305-7364
dc.identifier.other29267906 (pubmed)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/9416
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press for Annals of Botany Company
dc.relationThe original publication is available from Oxford University Press for Annals of Botany Company - https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcx128 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcx128
dc.relation.isPartOfAnnals of Botany
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcx128
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectboosted regression trees
dc.subjectplant development and life-history traits
dc.subjectrecalcitrant seeds
dc.subjectseed desiccation sensitivity
dc.subjectseed functional traits
dc.subjectseed storage behaviour
dc.subject.anzsrc2020ANZSRC::3103 Ecology
dc.subject.anzsrc2020ANZSRC::3108 Plant biology
dc.subject.meshSeeds
dc.subject.meshDesiccation
dc.subject.meshEcosystem
dc.subject.meshModels, Theoretical
dc.titleTaxonomic affinity, habitat and seed mass strongly predict seed desiccation response: A boosted regression trees analysis based on 17 539 species
dc.typeJournal Article
lu.contributor.unitLU
lu.contributor.unitLU|OLD BPRC
lu.contributor.unitLU|Research Management Office
lu.contributor.unitLU|Research Management Office|OLD QE18
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0442-9950
pubs.issue1
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcx128
pubs.volume121
Files