A quantitative assessment of an outsourced agricultural extension service in the Umzimkhulu District of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

dc.contributor.authorLyne, Michael
dc.contributor.authorJonas, N
dc.contributor.authorOrtmann, GF
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-09T21:12:09Z
dc.date.available2017-10-10
dc.date.issued2017-10-10
dc.date.submitted2017-09-28
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study evaluates the impact of an outsourced extension service delivered by Lima Rural Development Foundation (Lima) in the Umzimkhulu district of South Africa. The evaluation is conducted at both the household and program levels. Design/methodology/approach: Household impacts were estimated using two-stage regression with instrumental variables to account for selection bias. Gains in household income were extrapolated to estimate the net incremental benefit of the program and its financial return at district level. These analyses were underpinned by a rigorous sampling design. Findings: The results show that the outsourced extension service made a significant and substantial contribution to household crop income and net income. In addition, clients perceived a range of socio-economic benefits such as better diets, improved product quality, and job creation. Analysis of the financial cost and benefit of the extension service at district level suggests an annual net incremental benefit of R5 million (US$0.4 million), and a 95% probability that returns to the service exceeded 20% in 2012/2013. Practical implications: These results suggest that there is good reason for donors to continue funding effective extension services to small farmers in areas of high agricultural potential. Theoretical implications: This is an empirical study. It uses well-established methods to measure the impact but introduces a local economy multiplier to capture some of the indirect effects of agricultural extension. Originality/value: This research is valuable as very few studies worldwide have evaluated the impact of agricultural extension services at both the farm and program levels.
dc.format.extent14 pages
dc.identifierhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=elements_prod&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000428124700004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1389224X.2017.1387159
dc.identifier.eissn1750-8622
dc.identifier.issn1389-224X
dc.identifier.otherGA2CQ (isidoc)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/8863
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis on behalf of Wageningen University
dc.relationThe original publication is available from Taylor & Francis on behalf of Wageningen University - https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2017.1387159 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2017.1387159
dc.relation.isPartOfThe Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2017.1387159
dc.rights© 2017 Wageningen University
dc.subjectagricultural extension
dc.subjectsmallholders
dc.subjectimpact assessment
dc.subjectprogram evaluation
dc.subjectSouth Africa
dc.subjectLima rural development foundation
dc.subject.anzsrcANZSRC::0701 Agriculture, Land and Farm Management
dc.subject.anzsrc2020ANZSRC::3904 Specialist studies in education
dc.titleA quantitative assessment of an outsourced agricultural extension service in the Umzimkhulu District of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
dc.typeJournal Article
lu.contributor.unitLU
lu.contributor.unitLU|Faculty of Agribusiness and Commerce
lu.contributor.unitLU|Research Management Office
lu.contributor.unitLU|Faculty of Agribusiness and Commerce|AGMK
lu.contributor.unitLU|Research Management Office|OLD QE18
lu.contributor.unitLU|Research Management Office|OLD PE20
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4530-1195
pubs.issue1
pubs.publication-statusPublished online
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2017.1387159
pubs.volume24
Files