Adaptive governance good practice: Show me the evidence!

dc.contributor.authorSharma-Wallace, L
dc.contributor.authorVelarde, SJ
dc.contributor.authorWreford, Anita
dc.coverage.spatialEngland
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-21T22:13:41Z
dc.date.available2018-05-26
dc.date.issued2018-09-15
dc.date.submitted2018-05-21
dc.description.abstractAdaptive governance has emerged in the last decade as an intriguing avenue of theory and practice for the holistic management of complex environmental problems. Research on adaptive governance has flourished since the field's inception, probing the process and mechanisms underpinning the new approach while offering various justifications and prescriptions for empirical use. Nevertheless, recent reviews of adaptive governance reveal some important conceptual and practical gaps in the field, particularly concerning challenges in its application to real-world cases. In this paper, we respond directly to the empirical challenge of adaptive governance, specifically asking: which methods contribute to the implementation of successful adaptive governance process and outcomes in practice and across cases and contexts? We adopt a systematic literature review methodology which considers the current body of empirical literature on adaptive governance of social-ecological systems in order to assess and analyse the methods affecting successful adaptive governance practice across the range of existing cases. We find that methods contributing to adaptive governance in practice resemble the design recommendations outlined in previous adaptive governance scholarship, including meaningful collaboration across actors and scales; effective coordination between stakeholders and levels; building social capital; community empowerment and engagement; capacity development; linking knowledge and decision-making through data collection and monitoring; promoting leadership capacity; and exploiting or creating governance opportunities. However, we critically contextualise these methods by analysing and summarising their patterns-in-use, drawing examples from the cases to explore the specific ways they were successfully or unsuccessfully applied to governance issues on-the-ground. Our results indicate some important underlying shared patterns, trajectories, and lessons learned for evidence-based adaptive governance good practice within and across diverse sectors, issues, and contexts.
dc.format.extentpp.174-184
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.identifierS0301-4797(18)30598-X
dc.identifierhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=elements_prod&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000438479300022&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.067
dc.identifier.eissn1095-8630
dc.identifier.issn0301-4797
dc.identifier.other29843090 (pubmed)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/12737
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relationThe original publication is available from Elsevier - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.067 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.067
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Environmental Management
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.067
dc.rights© 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
dc.subjectadaptive governance
dc.subjectenvironmental governance
dc.subjectsocial-ecological systems
dc.subjectsystematic literature review
dc.subject.meshLeadership
dc.subject.meshDecision Making
dc.subject.meshEcosystem
dc.subject.meshKnowledge
dc.titleAdaptive governance good practice: Show me the evidence!
dc.typeJournal Article
lu.contributor.unitLU
lu.contributor.unitLU|Agribusiness & Economics Research Unit
lu.contributor.unitLU|Research Management Office
lu.contributor.unitLU|Research Management Office|OLD QE18
lu.contributor.unitLU|Research Management Office|OLD PE20
lu.contributor.unitLU|Centre of Excellence for One Biosecurity Research, Analysis and Synthesis
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9546-4080
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.067
pubs.volume222
Files