Effect of boundary type and season on predatory arthropods associated with field margins on New Zealand farmland

dc.contributor.authorBowie, Michael
dc.contributor.authorKlimaszewski, J
dc.contributor.authorVink, Cornelis
dc.contributor.authorHodge, S
dc.contributor.authorWratten, SD
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-28T23:41:02Z
dc.date.available2014-09-24
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstract© 2014 The Royal Society of New Zealand. Pitfall traps were used to monitor predatory arthropod numbers along two types of field boundary, a post and wire fence line and a Cupressus macrocarpa hedge, along the same paddock margin in Canterbury, New Zealand, over 24 months. The seven most abundant predator groups recorded were: Araneae > Phalangiidae > Staphylinidae > Coccinellidae > Chilopoda > Hemerobiidae > Carabidae. Araneae, Phalangiidae, Staphylinidae, Chilopoda and Hemerobiidae were found in larger numbers at the wire fence than at the hedge site, whereas the numbers of Carabidae and Coccinellidae adults exhibited no field margin preference. However, more species of Araneae and Staphylinidae were caught at the hedge site, whereas species richness of carabid beetles was greatest at the wire fence. Principal component analysis clearly separated the samples collected from the two habitats based on the assemblages of Araneae, Staphylinidae and Carabidae, and certain species in each of these taxonomic groups appeared to be particularly associated with one boundary type or the other. All the main taxonomic groups exhibited clear seasonal patterns, with distinct peaks in abundance occurring at certain times of the year. The results of the study reinforce the idea that management of field boundaries can be used to manipulate the type and abundance of particular groups of predatory arthropods, and that seasonal patterns should be taken into account in schemes of integrated pest management so that any adverse effects of biocide application on these beneficial species may be minimised.
dc.format.extentpp.268-284
dc.identifierhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=elements_prod&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000345380300005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
dc.identifier.citationBowie, M.H., Klimaszewski, J., Vink, C.J., Hodge, S., & Wratten, S.D. (2014). Effect of boundary type and season on predatory arthropods associated with field margins on New Zealand farmland. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 41(4), 268-284. doi 10.1080/03014223.2014.953552
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03014223.2014.953552
dc.identifier.eissn1175-8821
dc.identifier.issn0301-4223
dc.identifier.otherAU1KS (isidoc)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10182/7624
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis on behalf of the Royal Society of New Zealand
dc.relationThe original publication is available from Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Royal Society of New Zealand - https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2014.953552 - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03014223.2014.953552
dc.relation.isPartOfNew Zealand Journal of Zoology
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2014.953552
dc.rights© 2014 The Royal Society of New Zealand
dc.subjectAraneae
dc.subjectboundaries
dc.subjectCarabidae
dc.subjectChilopoda
dc.subjectCoccinellidae
dc.subjectHemerobiidae
dc.subjectPhalangiidae
dc.subjectphenology
dc.subjectpredators
dc.subjectStaphylinidae
dc.subject.anzsrcANZSRC::060808 Invertebrate Biology
dc.subject.anzsrcANZSRC::0701 Agriculture, Land and Farm Management
dc.subject.anzsrcANZSRC::0703 Crop and Pasture Production
dc.subject.anzsrcANZSRC::070301 Agro-ecosystem Function and Prediction
dc.subject.anzsrcANZSRC::070308 Crop and Pasture Protection (Pests, Diseases and Weeds)
dc.subject.anzsrc2020ANZSRC::3109 Zoology
dc.titleEffect of boundary type and season on predatory arthropods associated with field margins on New Zealand farmland
dc.typeJournal Article
lu.contributor.unitLU
lu.contributor.unitLU|Agriculture and Life Sciences
lu.contributor.unitLU|Agriculture and Life Sciences|AGSC
lu.contributor.unitLU|Agriculture and Life Sciences|ECOL
lu.contributor.unitLU|OLD BPRC
lu.contributor.unitLU|Research Management Office
lu.contributor.unitLU|Research Management Office|OLD QE18
lu.contributor.unitLU|Research Management Office|OLD PE20
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2105-111X
lu.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4237-0117
pubs.issue4
pubs.notesDate of acceptance 31 Jul 2014
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03014223.2014.953552
pubs.volume41
Files